Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Second opinion (Score 1) 365

imagine the prosecution telling the jury that the fingerprint/DNA test is 99.99% accurate, therefore he must be guilty

Those are different circumstances than what is discussed in TFA. The police don't round up 10,000 random people, give them all DNA tests, then charge the people that match with the crime.

Comment Re:Where there's a will... (Score 1) 438

I'd argue the same for hardcore games too, only the hits will be profitable. The difference is in the cost of production. Suppose you can make eight casual games with the person-hours it takes to make one hardcore game. Two things happen: you're more likely to get a hit casual game, and a failed hardcore game is far more expensive.

I don't know the exact numbers, but anyway you look at it casual games will be more profitable and less risky. I doubt market saturation will be a problem. Popular games have a short life span and usually low investment from players, so good, novel games will always rise to the top.

Comment Re:Let me be the first critic (Score 1) 1127

Both are at fault. Kino should give a reasonable error message and suggest a solution when it can't open raw1394 (it might do this, haven't used it for awhile), and Ubuntu should either have the Kino menu entry run it with sudo. Alternatively, either of them could patch Kino to access raw1394 through a privileged, secure intermediary.

This kind of lazy, broken packaging happens a lot in Ubuntu, and probably other distributions too. It's a drawback to using volunteer labor.

Comment Re:ebay maybe? (Score 1) 546

If the NSA knew how to do that, would they really give the technique away for $500? Moreover, would they reveal that they could do it for $500?

You're correct, but do you seriously think the NSA is interested in what's on your hard drive? If they are, it's a good bet that the FBI will seize it before you can destroy it.

I don't understand why cryptography/data destruction discussions end up speculating on the NSA's capabilities. They're irrelevant, because if the US government truly wants information that you have, you've already lost. If you couldn't afford some senators to call off the hunt before it started, you don't have the resources to defend yourself.

Maybe I'm just being cynical, so if you have examples where destroying hard drives has kept someone out of Federal (or secret) prison I'd like to know.

Slashdot Top Deals

"I've seen it. It's rubbish." -- Marvin the Paranoid Android

Working...