Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:That's no moon (Score 0) 113

My first impressions after watching both movies and reading both books, IIRC, since it was many years ago (I'm 34), were:

2001: great book, masterpiece of a movie.
2010: maybe even a better book than 2001, but a regular movie.

I still enjoyed the whole thing, of course.

I was able to see a restored version of 2001 in a proper movie screen in the end of the 90's. That's an experience I won't forget.

I do find it weird that people who love the book consider the movie boring though... I mean, it goes by faster than the book, of course, and it's basically the same thing, just masterfully illustrated. It's like watching a slide show. I actually have a book about the movie, with thousands of pictures from the actual frames. Interesting stuff.

Comment Re:That's no moon (Score -1, Flamebait) 113

Well, it would be if it was possible to watch it without falling asleep within less than an hour into the film.

You must be american. It's no wonder a genius of that magnitude decided to get the hell out. I hope you choke on popcorn the next time you think you're watching a movie.

There's so much on that masterpiece you'd take your lifetime just to grasp the obvious 10%. If you could focus for more than half an hour, that is.

But hey, don't take my word for it.

Comment Re:That's no moon (Score 0) 113

The book retains the original planet of Saturn, yet strangely it gets changed to Jupiter in the later books (I guess to be canon with the movie?

They should either change the whole thing (in all books, including 2001) to Jupiter, or stick with Saturn in all books (again, including 2001) since we know the reason why Kubrick couldn't stick to the original plan.

It's something that can easily be changed in a book in any new edition, but in the movie... well, not so much. Not to mention Kubrick would rise from the dead and destroy all manking if someone even thought about changing something in one of his movies. Covers and posters included!

Anyway, too bad slashdot wasn't around in the 60's so we could fix this. Now it's kind of too late.

Comment Re:Physchology (Score 0) 274

Yes, they managed to fool everyone in there into thinking that they were actually in space (until they led them out to their first space walk to an audience). The space ship had a gravity generator in it which is why there was no change in gravity strength. They didn't go insane.

Well, if they fell for that they didn't have to go insane, they'd have a huge headstart to begin with.

It's a shame I wasn't involved in the production of that one! I'd apoint one as commander and give him a Napoleon suit!

Comment Re:I've Heard This Story Before (Score 0) 381

You know why we won't see that? Because that would require the kids to leave their homes and go outside.

Other way around! We won't see that, because we would have to leave our homes and go outside to see the teens.

This is getting too technical for me and there's no wikipedia entry for 'outside' or 'outdoors'...

Slashdot Top Deals

Marriage is the triumph of imagination over intelligence. Second marriage is the triumph of hope over experience.

Working...