Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:It's dead either way, why not try this? (Score 1) 371

By its nature, Ham radio transmissions are even more open the TCP/IP. Anyone can monitor any transmission... if they're tuned to the right frequency and within range of the signal.

Whether or no the NSA bothers to listen to HF/VHF/UHF/etc is another issue. If they wanted to, they could. The only signals they might have trouble with is some of the shorter wavelengths working simplex, where the transmissions don't go far enough to reach a listening station.

Comment Re:It's dead either way, why not try this? (Score 1) 371

Not really. The "fees" for an amateur radio license are trivial... $14 is the going rate to take a license test, and its good for 10 years. The government isn't making money on it. The rules are in place and generally followed by people because everyone who is currently licensed have agreed that is how they want to play.

Again, as the grandparent post pointed out, if you don't want to play the game that is being played, choose another game. There are other radio based services that are different and may allow the type of communications that you want.

Comment Re:Good news - now Novartis will make generics :-) (Score 1) 288

On the other hand, pharma R&D will make its money solely from creating new drugs and licensing fees.

A new drug costs $$$ to bring to market, between all the testing required. For every drug successfully marketed, there are 10 or 100 that never make it. The successful drugs have to bear the cost of the unsuccessful ones, to the tune of Billion$ of dollars per drug. Those costs have to be recaptured somewhere. Currently by selling at a high price. If it is strictly by licensing fees, that those fees will be very high, and the marketing/production companies will have to pay them, and thus have to recapture their costs. Nothing changes.

Is there waste and abuse in the pharma industry? Undoubtedly. Better ask what percentage it is before you throw the baby out with the bathwater.

Comment Solar will work, if you put it in orbit. (Score 1) 626

There's been plenty of research done regarding collection of solar via orbiting power stations, and relaying it back to Earth via microwaves. Yes, there probably are some downsides regarding the energy balance of the planet (if you do enough of it), and after a while you'll cover the Earth in receivers or push the power of the microwaves to a level to cook us all, but by that point we'll all be dead anyway from other causes.

With the recent burse of companies pushing into space, this is no longer a fantasy.

Comment Value of Materials Is In Orbit (Score 1) 223

I don't even need to RTFA. I've been following this concept for 30 years before these companies finally decided to talk about it. The Trillions of dollars of materials are not worth Trillions of dollars on Earth... this is their value in orbit based on present day LEO launch values, which run upwards of $1K/lb.

While it is possible that there may someday be a market on the Earth from some space produced material... I'll lay odds that it will be in the form of some manufactured good/material produced in Zero G, and impossible to make on Earth. It will not be raw materials.

Slashdot Top Deals

Don't panic.

Working...