Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Abuse of IQ terminology (Score 1) 243

Lewis Terman (Wikipedia):

Early on, Terman adopted William Stern's suggestion that mental age/chronological age times 100 be made the intelligence quotient or IQ.

Revisions (mostly recently the fifth) of the Stanford-Binet remain in widespread use as a measure of general intelligence for both adults and for children.

Unlike Binet and Simon, whose goal was to identify less able school children in order to aid them with the needed care required, Terman proposed using IQ tests to classify children and put them on the appropriate job-track.

William Stern (Wikipedia:

During Stern's time, many other psychologists were working on ways to qualitatively assess individual differences. Alfred Binet and Théodore Simon, for instance, were developing tests to assess the mental age of children in order to identify learning disabilities, but lacked a standardized way to compare these scores across populations of children. Stern suggested a change in the formula for intelligence, which has previously been calculated using the difference between an individual's mental age and chronological age. Instead, Stern proposed dividing an individual's mental age by their chronological age to obtain a single ratio. This formula was later improved by Lewis Terman, who multiplied the intelligence quotient by 100 to obtain a whole number.[6]

It seems that the point of the IQ methodology, added on to preexisting intelligence testing, was intended to come up with a general measure that was comparable across populations. Disagree?

Comment Re:Up to 24G? (Score 2) 150

Completely agree re the 8gb, especially as that is shared between desktop and RAM. However, having used one of the minimal spec M* macbook airs before, it was completely fine for average desktop usage (ie web browser machine, maybe Word/Excel).

The 256gb I don't think matters at all for many people.

Comment Re:Capital One ruins everything they touch (Score 1) 178

I feel you on the local bank. My local bank, one with a long history in my area and the first bank I opened an account with in highschool, got bought out by Wells Fargo and it just went to hell. I'm still sad about that one. I'm not surprised that Capital One was similiar when dealing with a local bank.

On your other points, I've never had any issues with Capital One website or tech. I've used the chat function a handful of times over the years (I had an accidental late payment on a credit card once; one check I was depositng was having issues clearing; etc) and they were very good. Removed my fees in the case of the late payment, figured out the failure to deposit. Basically, nothing to complain about. I don't doubt your experiences at all, I just haven't had the same.

Comment Re:I look forward to my players having seven finge (Score 2) 42

Yeah. AI, such a very hot buzzword right now. Never mind that it results in people having random numbers of sausage fingers. Picasso would be outraged at the theft of his techniques.

The finger thing is already a lot better--it certainly WAS the case that teeth, limbs, and fingers were dead give aways. It's already gotten much harder to identify and catch.

Comment Re:Tomorrow's Technology? (Score 1) 57

I'd love to tune out the airplane with one if it actually works as advertised.

FWIW, you will definitely need noise cancelling headphones as well.

There's supposedly a "travel mode" that deals with some of the bounce from cars or airplanes, but it remains to be seen how good that is.

Comment Re:Whoa what are the odds (Score 1) 147

I have extended this offer to everyone announcing the rapture: I give you 10% of your net worth right now. And I get your net worth an hour after the rapture.

Yes, there will be a contract, I'm not an idiot...

So, if the rapture never occurs, you never get anything...? Seems like a pretty good deal to me.

Comment Re:Haaa Vaaaahd? (Score 1) 172

I'm not sure "redeeming" is quite the right, and I don't personally agree with everything Gay said (nor do I think she said everything particularly well), but, as the saying goes, I'll defend her right to say it. The question was a trap and Gay walked into. Nuance is lost when politicians set up traps.

Europeans and Americans have, traditionally, had very different views on "hate speech." I think we're much closer now than we were even 20 years ago.

I said something like this in another post, but for me, the bottom line is really:

A. Are Palestinians or others allowed to call for "intifada" or active fighting against Israel? This implies fighting and killing Israelis.
B. Are Israelis or others allowed to call for ongoing bombing and fighting in Gaza and the West Bank? This implies fighting and killing Palestinians.

I do not believe statement B can be allowed while statement A is banned.

If supports of Israeli can call for bombing Gaza, than supporters of Palestinians should be able to call for attacking Israel.

We've been a post-truth society forever, perhaps. The only difference is that previously, a relatively smaller cohort could more easily control the narrative (politicians, news media, etc). With the Internet and social media, this is much harder. It's certainly made society much less coherent.

Comment Re:Haaa Vaaaahd? (Score 1) 172

I hope the fact that you literally can't show me one single thing I've said in this conversation that is not true would lead you to a moment of introspection. Should be easy to do, if you're correct.

It's easier just to resort to schoolyard insults. Freedom is hard, and freedom of speech is especially hard. Truth is even harder.

Happy to continue chatting if you have anything to add other than sticking your fingers in your ears and chanting Nazi.

Comment Re: Haaa Vaaaahd? (Score 1) 172

Because Israel doesn't control the West Bank

Maps:
https://conquer-and-divide.btselem.org/map-en.html
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3b/West_Bank_Access_Restrictions_June_2020.pdf

Israel controls the West Bank. There are enclaves of Palestinian Authority control, but you cannot travel from one end of the West Bank to the other without encountering Israeli control. Israel regularly runs operations throughout and within these enclaves.

nor did it operate in Gaza (until a few months ago).

Israel controlled all land and sea borders around Gaza. Israel controlled trade in and out of Gaza. Israel destroyed the only airport facilities in Gaza and, through sanctions and control of trade, blocked construction of a new airport. Israel has run dozens of operations within Gaza in the last decade alone (if not more), predating the current war.

Comment Re:Haaa Vaaaahd? (Score 1) 172

Well, ignoring that Stefanik is presupposing that advocacy for either intifada or usage of the statement ("from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free") means genocide (and I don't universally agree with that presupposition), Gay's continued answer is:

CLAUDINE GAY: When speech crosses into conduct that violates our policies, including policies against bullying, harassment or intimidation, we take action. And we have robust disciplinary processes that allow us to hold individuals accountable.

Which again brings me back to my core point. If even saying that Palestinians are allowed to fight back against Israel--Intifada--is genocidal and anti-Semitic, then we have failed as a society that even pretends to protect free speech.

Flip it on its head. Are Jewish students allowed to call for continued bombing in Gaza? That is literally and explicitly calling for the murder of Palestinians. Why is statement A ok but statement B is not?

Slashdot Top Deals

Doubt is a pain too lonely to know that faith is his twin brother. - Kahlil Gibran

Working...