I don't get it. If they are not satisfied with shipping company offer, they should just switch to another shipping company. Vote with wallet.

You seem to forgot who developed big part of Wifi standards. It was CSIRO - Australian entity.

Cleancache was just recently posted to LKML: Cleancache [PATCH 0/7] (was Transcendent Memory): overview.

Google for ,,techno viking''. This guy would rock as Thor.

And GPS unit can be quickly paired using Bluetooth.

Well, we already have standard for onboard flash connector - it's just a matter of implementation in mainstream. Serious business already uses flash modules without SATA interposer. Just google for images of Oracle F5100 Array.

AMD is just about to ship 12-core Magny Cours to customers. That's a beast!

You are mistaken. Linux Torvalds uses Fedora Linux.

The whole site and paper looks like an attempt at marketing Xing. I never heard of this site before, now it's on the news.

IPv6 for NFS is available since Linux 2.6.30, according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NFSClientIPv6

Gnome-shell, which will be GNOME 3.0 main UI, is written in JavaScript and works pretty well. JS is capable of much more than flashy web site.

At least in London there are very helpful (and crucial for surviving) paintings on crossings. They literally state "look right" or "look left".

Being cutting edge is what I like in Fedora. As for some kernel backports -- among them are btrfs backports. Those are changes which weren't even written when .31 was released. But those changes and fixes are quite important and I'm happy that Josef merged them in .31 shipped by Fedora.

I would treat it as "google owned".

Uhm, are you feeling OK? Btrfs is in Linux kernel, it is constantly being ,,released'' -- repositiories are wide open for everyone at http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-unstable.git;a=summary . Look into the mailinglist, contributions are comming from many companies (Red Hat included). Sun aquisition have exactly zero effect on btrfs development.

That said, as a ZFS fan, I'm dissapointed by Apple's move. Support in another high-profile operating system would be good for ZFS.