Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Not artificial (Score 1) 221

"Erythritol is an organic compound – a naturally-occurring, four-carbon sugar alcohol" [...] "Occurs naturally in some fruit and fermented foods"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

In industrial quantities, they make it from from glucose by fermentation with a yeast, Moniliella pollinis. Not sure whether that counts as artificial.

Either way this is interesting to me, as I fully switched from sugar to erythritol (and stevia). They can't be worse than sugar, can they?

Submission + - Is Rust really safer? (acm.org)

Beeftopia writes: Rust has two modes: its default, safe mode, and an unsafe mode. In its default, safe mode, Rust prevents memory errors, such as "use-after-free" errors. It also prevents "data races" which is unsynchronized access to shared memory. In its unsafe mode (via use of the "unsafe" block), in which some of its APIs are written, it allows the use of potentially unsafe C-style features. The key challenge in verifying Rust's safety claims is accounting for the interaction between its safe and unsafe code. This article from the April CACM provides an overview of Rust and investigates its safety claims.

Comment Re:Nailed it. (Score 1) 141

Love and obedience are both voluntary according to Christianity. We have an invitation, but you and I aren't forced to go either way. It's entirely up to each and every one of us.

In Christianity, God isn't just an adult who is a few decades older than we are. He's eternal.

Of course God could have created a world without the godless afterlife. But that would have been equivalent to forcing everyone into heaven, and God respects our free will too much to do that. His company is voluntary.

Jesus taught that God created us for a fulfilling eternal life. Humanity (you and I and most people in history) messed up, and we are currently subject to a partly-godless world, with a way back provided for us, and another way to try and stick it out without God.

I don't want to change your mind about God. If you want to be an atheist or a skeptic, be one. But the understanding in your comment doesn't have much to do with Christianity.

To the AC 2 below:
The tree of morality (kudos, many don't understand it for what it is) represented the choice between letting God tell / teach humanity what's right and wrong. Eating from the fruit was about taking that right into our own hands, which set mankind on a painful but fixable detour.

If God hadn't left such a way out of the Garden, he would have locked us in, which would have conflicted with that crucial principle at the start of my comment: love relationships are voluntary.

Comment Re:Nailed it. (Score 0) 141

> "Love me, and obey me, or I will torture you forever."

About the first part: children should love and obey their parents, because they are their parents, and because they know what's best for them. True or false?
Regarding the second part - Christianity doesn't teach anything like that. Pain, suffering and regret will be the *inherent* consequences of the godless afterlife.

> "You are evil and you deserve to suffer, and the only thing good about you is your association with Me."

"I know the plans I have for you: to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future."
"The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy; I have come that they may have life, and have it to the full."

Comment Re:Have I Been Pwned Website (Score 2) 81

He is right though. If you can get yourself to trust HaveIBeenPwned.com (and it's a pretty well-known security site), then you get free reports of all major password leaks from all other sites, even itself if that ever happens. If you can't trust it, then you you implicitly trust *all* the other sites you sign up for to not get hacked, or to reliably notify you when they do. Now which is easier: to trust one site, or to trust all of them minus the first one?

Slashdot Top Deals

Never ask two questions in a business letter. The reply will discuss the one you are least interested, and say nothing about the other.

Working...