I have to take a leak. Also, this electric drill I bought last week to work on a bust of Steve Jobs has an emergency recall on it from the manufacturer- shows symptoms of power failure. My target date for completion of the project- without help and delays- depends on how much time I spend on these social media sites; they sure are addictive... almost like narcotics. BTW, has anyone seen that remake of 3:10 to Yuma? I heard it's pretty good.

Are they environmental extremists? Not sure I've heard of them.

Let me know when any of those vehicles get 50MPG and then you can talk about them being the most "eco-friendly".

Do you seriously think Mickey Mouse will ever go out of copyright? Disney won't ever let that happen. They will keep pushing for longer and longer copyright windows until it's forever. They've been pretty successful at it so far.

The nuts are who the media focuses on and they spread their message much easier and faster than the sane people.

$5 early matinee and no drinks and no snacks; pretty damn cheap entertainment. However, we do have a large HDTV and watch lots of stuff at home, too. But there are some films that really are worth seeing on the big screen and millions of other people also think so and that's why Hollywood's model still works- to the tune of billions of dollars a year. Go pedal your misinformation elsewhere.

Thank jebus he wasn't FDR because then we would have been royally fracked.

Most, if not all, of them believe in auditing which is all connected to the Xenu/dead alien soul nonsense. But I would ask you if you think it's worse for people to not believe in any of that stuff and still tell people if they give them money they will take their pain and misery away. IMO, that seems far worse than if they, the CoS, actually believed all of it and were trying to help people, as ignorant and misguided as that would be.

James Randi never said that because those particular dousers could not find water under those particular conditions that all dousers could not find water under those particular conditions or any other conditions ever. He has never laid these out as rules. But you would know that if you actually bothered to understand what exactly Randi has been doing for more than 50 years.

It is not science's job to disprove a supernatural claim made by someone. We need positive proof; repeatable positive proof. That is how science works. We know water boils at 100 degrees Celsius(~at sea level, of course) . And we know it because it has been positively proven countless times by people trying to figure out at exactly what temperature water boils.

And you're just dead wrong. People that make these kinds of extraordinary/supernatural claims have the burden of positive proof. It is not for anyone to disprove them since they are the ones making the claim in the first place. If I tell people I can do a backflip and dunk the basketball on a regulation 10' basketball goal, no one is required to try and disprove this claim; I have to put up or shut up. What is claimed must be repeatable and if it cannot be repeated in a timely manner then it is debunked. Simple as that.

Spoken like a true close-minded willfully ignorant troll.

Something tells me you haven't dealt with many actual real life policeman. Your comment is ignorance personified.

Agriculture sure does consume water. How else do you explain the majority of fruits and vegetables being comprised of 85% or more of water?

And then in the 20th century one of his family did the same thing.