"My opinion is there is problem as I see it is there is a big abuse on free speech."
I totally agree. After the Las Vegas mass shooting, I spent most of two days watching youtube conspiracy theories about it. It was pretty clear that they were wrong, but nonetheless, I found them fascinating. Since when is all entertainment required to be educational? And what if the videos had turned out to be correct?
The authorities "knew" that Galileo was wrong back in the 17th century, but that didn't make their censorship of him OK.
Is this already being used for advertising purposes? I had a potentially serious health issue last month, and received my very first snail mail advertisement for "cremation services" 30 days later. I'm feeling like the modern tech economy has become a committee of vultures circling over all of our heads.
1) Tulips don't have a limited supply. I.e. as tulips are bred, their supply can increase exponentially over time.
2) Tulips aren't divisible. I.e. you can't pay 0.032 tulips for something.
3) Tulips aren't easily transportable. I.e. you can't send a tulip to china in a few minutes.
4) Tulips aren't durable. If you kept one for 20 years, it would be unlikely to be in good condition afterwards.
5) Tulips aren't uniform. One tulip is not like another.
That's not possible. 4KB is 32000 bits, so there are 2 ^ 32000 ~= 10 ^ 10000 possible 4KB sequences. That's a one followed by 10,000 zeros number of sequences you would have needed to compare to find the one you were looking for. If you could have compared a billion sequences / second, it would have taken the age of the universe times nearly infinity to locate the sequence you were looking for. You must have had a bug in your code - perhaps your random number generator was faulty, or you weren't comparing the full 4KB length of the data.
I might remember something about that 30 year ago scheme! One of my father's friends (a professional mathematician who worked for a well-known defense contractor) invested in it in mid-1987. I thought about it and told my father's friend that I didn't think the claims were plausible and suggested that he try to get his money back - which annoyed him. Never heard anything about it since, and my father's friend died many years ago. I wish I knew the name of the technology or company.
He's using 50 polygons to render the final picture. By appearances, each polygon has roughly five vertexes. Each vertex needs an x and y position, so say two bytes total per vertex. That's 500 bytes for the whole picture, and the picture looks pretty grainy.
LOL
Actually that's a different university. USF != UCSF
It goes back even farther than that!
Here's an article from 2010 reporting Seagate promising 100TB HAMR hard drives:
http://www.myce.com/news/seaga...
Here's an article from 2006 reporting Seagate promising HAMR hard drives in "a few years":
http://webcache.googleusercont...
Also I'm puzzled by the claims about hundred layer 3D NAND chips. I can see how a hundred-layer chip would increase density and therefore could reduce access latency, but I don't see how it could significantly reduce cost-per-bit. Sure, there will be a hundred times as many bits per square cm, but a hundred times as many manufacturing processing steps should be required to make it, thereby increasing manufacturing cost a hundred-fold. Also, with all those manufacturing steps, the chance of defects also goes up, thereby reducing yields and increasing costs even more. Reduced latency would be cool, but I don't see it reducing cost-per-bit by much, if at all.
Also, Intel seems to be peculiarly self-contradicting when discussing their 3D XPoint technology. In 2015 they claimed that 3D XPoint was NOT phase-change technology and that it was already in volume production to prepare for sale in early 2016. In 2016 they're claiming that 3D XPoint IS phase-change technology and will not enter volume production until 2017.
I've become very cynical about all this. Frankly, I'll believe these things when I can see them with my own eyes.
You got 28,900,000 results because you forgot to use quotation marks.
This file will self-destruct in five minutes.
