This is gag, right? Right??

In 1900, the world pop was 1.5 billion. In 1960, it was 3 billion. Today, it is 7 billion. By 2040, it will be 9 billion.
What the hell would you call "rapidly expanding"?

but lead was phased out of alcohol on different dates in different parts of the country

But I like lead in my booze! Damn nanny state.

and a man is able to sustain an erection while asleep?

So you have never had a wet dream?

Jesus, what an idiot.

What is happening right now in the upper midwest is called "weather" not "climate".
Climate is a large-scale phenomenon (e.g. hemispheres) averaged over a long time (years or decades)
while weather is a small-scale phenomenon (e.g. "upper midwest") measured over a short time (weeks or months).

Looking at world climate, eight of the ten hottest years in history have occurred since 2000. The other two were in the late 90's.

Because in your version of Europe France doesn't exist.

One can dream.

Second line should have been "Only a tiny fraction of the original ore is uranium".

You clearly have zero knowledge of how uranium ore is processed into usable fuel.
Only an time fraction of the original ore is uranium.
Even then, the radiation level from an entire ton from of freshly-processed and purified U3O8 is about half that of what you will experience on a commercial jet flight.
Even after the fuel has been used in a reactor, it is still produces millions of times more radiation than the original ore.

If you have an irrational fear of buried nuclear isotopes then you should probably be more scared about the unspent versions that occur naturally.

There's nothing irrational about it, given that the post-fuel isotopes are millions of times more concentrated, and hence more dangerous, than the ones in the ground.

I use iTunes to transfer files between my computer and my ipad (and yes, it sucks). Is there another way?

But Frenkel quoted Nick Bostrom as saying this, not that he himself agreed with this.
Bostrom is an idiot who constantly makes nonsensical statistical arguments about among other things, the end of the world (see The Doomsday argument).

Perhaps one day one of the programmers will look over at their printer and find a little note from someone way down here inside the simulation.

And it will say:
PC Load Letter

In other words, more social "science" horseshit.
It's amazing that people get paid to do this.

Or,

• 5. Being an American skater looking for an excuse for sucking.

I imagine most just don't know what "Astrology" means off the tops of their head, and they probably think it's some scientific term for astronomy

It sounds like a short form of astrophysics.
They should have defined the terms before asking the questions.
This was a very poorly written survey.