If I come to you and I say you either take a new position with a worse title and decreased pay or you can fired, and you choose to resign, is it fair to say you simply "quit" rather than were forced out or kicked?

Yes.

I'm not the OP, but I absolutely think this is the time when things start to go seriously wrong with the Mozilla orgs.

Eich stepped down in 2018, the problems started in 2012/2013, and came to a head in 2014 with the change in plug-in architecture. The two are absolutely and completely unrelated, and I just assume anyone who conflates 'woke' with Mozilla's problems is a complete and utter moron. By 2018, Mozilla was circling the drain.

Found the dangerous religious zealot. You've concluded that people different from you are evil, which is the root of most of the problems in the world today. Basically, religion has turned you into a bigot. You are illustrative of the problems inherent in religion.

Poor low-effort troll must be bored. Sadface

There's a big difference between 'belief' and establishing a mental framework within which you assume X is true for the purposes of testing/discussing/dissecting Y

Do you believe in love

Nope

And belief without evidence is fucking stupid

He resigned, he wasn't forced out. And even if you argue that he was effectively forced out, it wasn't by 'some wokes in the Mozilla Foundation,' there was substantial public outcry and it was harming the Mozilla brand. Boycotts were in the works.

He perhaps WOULD HAVE been forced out, since Mozilla is a business, and Eich quickly became a poison pill. If you appoint a CEO that results in boycotts and lost profit, and then you remove him, are you being 'woke'? Or are you being a capitalist?

He wasn't forced out, and the reason for his ouster was common sense as applied to the bottom line. Not 'woke'

Well, yes. Do you want me to tell you that all chromium-based browsers are objectively worse than Firefox? I thought this entire topic kind of revolved around peoples' opinions wrt browsers

If this were because of 'wokeness' then Brendan Eich would have gone on to make a better browser. He did not, he made Brave instead

I understand that you're not interested in making coherent arguments, you're only here to spew nonsense, but since I've commented on this thread I can't mod you down, so I'm replying instead. Don't feel the need to respond, I won't take you seriously :)

I get that you're just making up lies that fit your political narrative, but just to add some reality to this thread - Brave is based on Chromium, and is way behind Firefox. Firefox has a lot of problems, but no Chromium-based browser can compare

They focus on things that don't matter, and they try way too hard to copy Chrome. I've been using Firefox for as long as it has existed, and it has been getting worse for years.

Well, no. You don't seem to understand this.

we can reasonably assume that juvenile access to firearms is also generally decreasing

You have, in reality, provided absolutely nothing that supports this assertion

Fewer kids have [access to] guns now than they used to

The number of households with guns is continually shrinking [npr.org], and guns mostly went from being stored in drawers and cabinets to being stored in lock boxes and safes over the last century.

Your second assertion, even if true, does not support your first. That assumes that kids have access to guns primarily through their own household. Has a study been done that actually examines childrens' access to guns? I would argue that it's increased, as the ammosexual sect has gained traction and started putting guns under every pillow in their home, in every nightstand, etc.

Why would I refute your nonsense with an argument? If you want an argument, make one first. You instead made a grade school insult. Typical cryptoscum.

So you ask a question, get an answer, then you say the answer is wrong, the real answer is that everyone is jealous of you. Got it. Shine on, you crazy diamond.