Give people a better alternative and you don't have to resort to the heavy hand of government to get people to move where you want them to go.
The problem with that is that you will have to deal with the (anti-)lobby of the established current businesses and their power of scale while you are trying to figure out how to scale up to the same level the established companies are. Large optimized production businesses are not built in a year, see Tesla as a recent example.
... but I'm sure the company could find sponsors for this vision of Tomorrowland.
I think a multi-billion dollar company should (be able to) pay for this themselves
>"but Gmail did revolutionize email."
How? I was there. I didn't see anything revolutionary about Gmail compared to other Email options.
As stated in the blurb, they offered a 1GB mailbox in a time where 15MB was the norm and you might have a family-shared mailbox of 50MB. PC's could be fitted with a whopping 300GB hard drive, and that was on the large end of the spectrum.
this guy chose grindr, cause the US never, ever, singled out LGBT people for suspicion in the past, eh?
From the story:
Yeagley chose Grindr because it happened to generate a particularly rich set of data and its user base might be uniquely vulnerable.
Emphasis mine.
If a thing's worth having, it's worth cheating for. -- W.C. Fields