Comment Re:Duh (Score 1, Troll) 17
In this case, it's UK's high court that may be guilty of scientific illiteracy.
In this case, it's UK's high court that may be guilty of scientific illiteracy.
Are you advocating for a return to feudalism in the UK? Or maybe they should entertain a dictator ala Cromwell?
Why don't you start your own web search company? Google's results have been shit for years, and they're getting worse. Granted you probably like some of the soft censorship they engage in, but still. The opportunity is there, and it should be relatively cheap to compete as long as you avoid their latest patents.
Dude what
How can you say it's cheap and then tell people to "feel free to look up their own numbers"? What a cop out.
We weren't discussing crop failure, but hey nice try to deflect and distract.
Put some numbers on it. And we were discussing wind, not solar. Also no fair ignoring upfront costs, long term maintenance, and intermittancy.
How cheap when you add a storage battery?
Endless growth is preferable to endless decline.
Have you ever read any of her opinions? She's a vastly inferior writer and thinker compared to justices like Thomas or Alito. Or even Sotomayor.
Poorly framed question. You haven't even bothered to say which gambling sites have these requirements or why.
To address the broader point of who should or should not regulate gambling websites, keep in mind that until recently, gambling was broadly against the law in the United States. There was a brief period where poker sites were allowing g anyone in the US to gamble, and the Feds stepped in to regulate (if I recall correctly).
Bingo. And Pornhub isn't hosted solely in Texas.
Everything on the Internet defaults to commerce between the states.
Unqualified? The only possibly unqualified justice is Brown, and that's a stretch.
Not really.a sensible argument. Sites like Pornhub are far from "safe", and kids aren't necessarily going to turn to Tor or something to get at snuff porn or whatever. They'll just lie about their age and/or use password aggregators as they did in the past to get on paid porn sites, which overall will have more tame content than the freaky amateur stuff on Pornhub.
The law likely violates the Interstate Commerce clause. Of course the Supreme threw out a questionable 1A argument.
He who has but four and spends five has no need for a wallet.