Comment Moving the production? (Score 1) 43
Isn't this just moving the production to 3rd world countries? Shouldn't countries strive to reduce *consumption* by 40%?
Isn't this just moving the production to 3rd world countries? Shouldn't countries strive to reduce *consumption* by 40%?
Problem with pfsense/opnsense is hardware support and BSD quirks (and toxic BSD fanboys).
For my hardware and configuration i was pretty much forced to use Linux based solution.
There's not even a question. Plasma - you can configure it to look like Xfce. I was long time Xfce user, I had issues with tearing and VRR on multiple monitors. So best alternative was to switch to Wayland+Plasma.
I still use Thunar though.
For sharing, there are Plasma addons that allow creating shares from context menus.
ssh -X works great on wayland client
If you're running wayland on remote, then you have whole different set of options. (no clue why you would do this at this point)
I was the same until about ~10 years ago. The only difference? Once you go mechanical, you can never go back.
It's like driving old Fiat to work every day for past 20 years... and you're not missing anything - it takes you from point A to point B. Then you replace it with Mercedes and it still takes you from point A to point B. But you'll never want to drive a Fiat anymore.
UI is very similar to Mobile windows. I liked it and it's not the reason Windows phones failed. There was some lack of apps, but we could live with it (I honestly still don't use them).
The real problem why I abandoned it are the bugs. Goddamn awful bugs. Imagine getting a call and sometimes (1 in 20 calls) screen would just stay black and phone was totally unresponsive for 10-15 seconds.
And whole OS was littered with stuff that just didn't work.
This was also described by ex-MS employee. They had a tight schedule for implementing new features and adding apps and they had to focus on that instead of fixing bugs.
All power corrupts, but we need electricity.