*sigh*. from the "citation needed" to the "agree with me or you're a lost cause" argument... I don't know why I would bother, but I guess I don't know better.
1. The fact is that the WORLD should rely on the WORLD Health Organization to, at least in a minor degree, be an impartial and rational judge of the impact of health threats across the globe. It's obvious that no such thing occurred.
2. Australia vs USA death rates are mostly irrelevant. Nowhere near the same amount of international travel occurs through Australia vs the US, so the vector for infection in Australia is significantly reduced. Not to mention that China already owns your government. While we're at it...
3. Compare Australia vs Italy and then tell me how irresponsible the Italian government was *while following directives from the WHO*. You want to look at that as a percentage of population, or is that simply too inconvenient?
Yeah, the US is fucking up severely by reopening too soon and has to deal with flat out retards in Texas denying service to people wearing masks and "mah freedums". That is what it is... but none of that changes the fact that the WHO is a sock-puppet of the Chinese government and killed tens of thousands of people based on the deep seated corruption of WHO "leadership". You can talk about everything that happened after the fact.... but the WHO killed a lot of people by parroting the "nothing to see here" storyline of their Chinese masters.