Well a good start might be to choose a workable business model. They've been pretty much running in circles since Google surpassed them as the lead search engine, in like what 2002 or so?

Well, if they graduated high school and still don't grasp fractions then something is seriously wrong.

Perhaps, but it wasn't available outside of a small number of specialists. I was a heavy computer user at that time I can guarantee you if it had been widely available I would have been all over that. Instead, for home users, the mid-1980s were mostly about BBS services, which while kind of similar, were by no means the huge interconnected thing that the internet has since become.

Minimizing future crime is certainly an important goal, but it's not the only one or even the most important one. The most important goal is that individuals should feel that they got enough justice that they're willing to abdicate their natural right to take matters into their own hands. A system which fails to meet that goal results in vigilantism and then eventually independent militias and civil war. This is one of the basics of being a civilized society ruled by laws rather than a group of barbarians.

Good, Americans like a war we can really sink our teeth into.

Should be in control and actually are in control are not the same thing.

Only if those who benefit most from that switch are the ones in control of the state. A more likely result is that investment just moves elsewhere and a lot of people are out of luck.

For items which are high in labor but low in raw materials, land use and energy cost, yes. Electronic devices are going to be pretty darn cheap, food, not so much.

Figure out one that doesn't suck or run on pipe dreams and you can count me in, for the moment there is no alternative.

There would still be limitations on the quantity of raw materials, land, and the total energy production capacity. It would certainly be vastly different than things are now, but that doesn't mean everything would be free.

Replace the word "reasonable" with "maximum" and you're closer to the truth.

It's mostly just a handy side effect.

Even complete elimination of labor costs would not result in the situation you're describing. Raw materials and land, at the very least, will still have value.

Laser pumped solar sail is about the only thing we have right now that would be anywhere near fast enough. Mostly because the "fuel" is generated at the departure point instead of needing to be carried along. It would be a huge project and frankly I don't think we're up to it politically but the science is pretty solid and the engineering is mostly there already.

Great, then lets see pictures of CEOs and other senior executives being escorted out of buildings.