Comment Go home asteroid - you are drunk. (Score 2) 84
.fff
.fff
The economics doesn't lie - Tax doesn't fund spending, and cant fund spending.
Yet this is against the mainstream politics view that it does and we need to cut spending, or increase tax to reduce the deficit.
Will the mainstream attempt to limit visibility of these 'fake' articles that say tax does not fund spending?
Its windows.....probably full of viruses. Probably better to look elsewhere for your chickens sake.
Money is all digital now. No gold backs it, or anything else. Just figures in a database....Ironically probably running Oracle.
The numbers can never run out.... We should not care., its just the same as some gamer scoring high points at pacman...
Well done to those companies.
INSTEAD, we should be turning our eyes to governments who are NOT creating enough debt to fund this. Public debt, the big scary 20 trillion figure, is where the money came from. We just need to add more to it to free up the economy and get people working again.
Its that easy.
Yes, they are a shit company.
BUT, they are also very, VERY cheep. In any case, most of the GPL violating stuff has been reversed engineered.
I run this as a home server - it works great.
"The law has been a fundamental of batteries for more than a century and a half."
Tax's dont fund spending. Haven't since we came off the gold standard. Instead, this research gives jobs to people qualified to do so, extending human knowlege.
With the scale of unemployment, would you rather they sit on social?
Bill gates doesn't have a clue. Not a clue.
If you tax robots, then there is LESS incentive to getting robots, and more work for humans to do.
Once you realise that tax does *not fund* expenditure, but is only there to prevent inflation and add value to money, you realise the absolute stupidity of what he suggests.
I thought javascript was single threaded.....hmmmm, itchy chin. itchy chin!
Pine Book laptop. $89. Awesome.
Real Users never use the Help key.