Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Try Safari (Score 1) 465

Safari is a good browser... not sure how the reviewer missed that browser. Chrome is just a fork of Safari with a lot of bloat and some questionable technical/moral decisions.

Chrome gained popularity on a VERY specific implementation and is succumbing to the same fate as IE. (e.g. Chrome on iOS/Android doesn't support extensions because of design decisions made before Google even forked Chrome off Apple's WebKit, Chrome's extension standard is a hodge-podge of stuff thrown at the wall over many years and can't ever be changed without breaking the Chrome world. Safari and Firefox support extensions on mobile browsers)

Comment Google Hate (Score 3, Insightful) 465

This guy must really LOATH Google... Most Chromebooks are equipped with only 4GB of RAM and are LOCKED into the bloated Chrome browser he's eviscerating in his review. You have to upgrade to the mid-tier Chromebooks to get the 8GB he finds completely unacceptable.

Comment Qualcomm still a bit slower (Score 1) 147

There are some real numbers at https://www.tomshardware.com/p...

The Snapdragon X is ~30% slower at single-core tasks than Apple's M3. (all M3 CPU types have similar single-core performance)

The Snapdragon X is ~15% faster in multi-core tasks than the base M3.

The Snapdragon is ~30% slower than the high-end M3-Max at multi-core tasks.

Snapdragon's performance is competitive with the entry-level Apple Macbooks and outclassed by higher-end Macbooks. Real-world energy usage on M3 Macbooks is RIDICULOUSLY GOOD, but we'll have to wait to see real products before we can compare that.

Comment Re:Worse than Nothing (Score 1) 81

What use case do you have for lossless transcoding from JPEG? I don’t get that point at all. As you pointed out, JPEG is used because it’s very compatible and easy to encode which are the two things dropped with jpegli(only mostly backward compatible and takes many times more processing power and exponentially more memory.

In the context of smaller lower-fidelity images used on the web Jpegxl/jpegli do considerably worse webp and way worse than HEIC/AVIF. JPEGXL and HEIC are both ONLY supported by Safari(no other browsers) while AVIF is supported by all major browsers. The big advantage HEIC has over AVIF is it’s substantially faster to encode(which gives Apple/iOS an edge since Apple uses it in everything Apple-related)

Comment Worse than Nothing (Score 5, Interesting) 81

Compression roughly equivalent to JPEG XL, slightly worse than WebP, and much worse than heic/heif/avi? why?

Google can’t be trusted with numbers; it made similar claims when launching WebP and it’s the compression comparisons were fairly misleading. https://siipo.la/blog/is-webp-...

This seems like it will get ramrodded through into Chrome, used on a handful of websites, and then support will get gradually be removed as Google abandons it for the next hotness.

heic/heif/avif files are already better on every metric and this new standard is WORSE than Google’s current WebP standard.

Comment Re:Since back in the days of the late Steve Jobs.. (Score 2) 65

Apple didn't originate Vendor Lock-In. Nintendo added lock-out chips when introducing the NES in the US/Europe because of the issues with quality controls in video games.

ALL the big tech companies are VERY bad about lock-in... with Apple likely being one of the least worrisome. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

Comment Re:How are these numbers aggregated? (Score 1) 31

I suspect that 66% Baidu number is wonky. Looking at statcounter.com’s worldwide numbers has Baidu at 0.9% of the market, which puts the China market at 1.3%. I’m guessing statcounter.com is only counting traffic that gets filtered through the great firewall of China as the “China Market”. Would be interesting to see raw numbers instead of percents.

Slashdot Top Deals

Business is a good game -- lots of competition and minimum of rules. You keep score with money. -- Nolan Bushnell, founder of Atari

Working...