Have you ever heard of any committee anywhere voluntarily disbanding?
FWIW,
The (informal) standardisation of Haskell 98 was an important turning point for another reason: it was the moment that the Haskell Committee disbanded. There was (and continues to be) a tremendous amount of innovation and activity in the Haskell community, including numerous proposals for language features. But rather than having a committee to choose and bless particular ones, it seemed to us that the best thing to do was to get out of the way, let a thousand flowers bloom, and see which ones survived.
A manderbrot set renderer I happened to write a few years ago in dc(1):
[lolssdsl0lqx]sx[1+lddd*lld*-ls+dsdrll2**lo+dsld*rd*+4<kd15>q]sq[q
]9ksk[d77/3*2-ss47lxx-P1+d78>0]s00[d23/.5-3*so0l0xr10P1+d24>u]dsux
The output of the program in case you don't feel like running it yourself.
'Better Jupiter than Earth,' say astronomers
I think I speak for all of us Jupiterian slashdotters when I say I have a problem with that statement.
Obviously, Microsoft® wants a monopoly on monopoly.
Too many people are thinking of security instead of opportunity. They seem more afraid of life than death. -- James F. Byrnes