They won't unless you light it under their feet.

You do have a right to freedom of press and that extends to both video and to the internet.

Hmm. I have a Yuengling lager in my hand, made and consumed in the U.S., and there is no stated alcohol percent anywhere on it. Maybe it's on the case? Don't know.

That amount would be (effectively) zero.

Uh, no. Race exists in all species, it is a subdivision of that species, just like species is a subdivision of a genus. In dogs we call them breeds. Where the boundaries lie between races is somewhat arbitrary. Between these groups, physical and biological differences are the rule, not the exception. If it helps you to call them "ethnicities", go right ahead, because those differences are smaller but still exist.

This doesn't mean an individual is defined by his or her race, only that they tend toward different means than those of other races. Nor does it excuse discrimination under the law, or treating members of some races poorly simply because they're a member of that race.

This is scientific, biological reality. Even if all the races died except for one, in 50,000 years there would be multiple races again, provided different populations were allowed to separate entirely for a while.

Yeah, my understanding is that other nations send them here on their dime, specifically so they will come home with that education.

BS. If you're from India or China, *everything* is attractive in the U.S., especially if you're a girl.

You don't have wifi insurance so not sure how this applies.

If that's the case, why isn't every Starbucks shut down for facilitating CP downloads? I think it's a fear that's blown far out of proportion. The most likely negative of sharing wifi is the person maxing out your bandwidth with Netflix downloads.

Not necessarily. Keep in mind they never go after "doanloaders", only uploaders. It's just that with torrents, they've made the argument that everyone in the swarm is an uploader.

Also, if 2 people share a file, there are several nodes between them that also share that file, but no one is ever sued except the end user. With a place like Torrent tracker sites, they've made the argument that they of course know they're trading illegal files, that they have received take-down requests and ignored them. Even places like Youtube are expected to ban things on request.

Now enter proxy torrenting. Who do they send a take-down request to? Even if they can pin an upload to a specific address, they need to show that you knew you were trading "The Avengers" which you almost certainly didn't.

It's a legal mountain.

Yes, the U.S. has lots of gun deaths.

This is an acceptable price of having the freedom to own guns.

Just like there is lots of domestic violence. This is the price of the freedom of cohabitation.

There's no problem with violence in America. It's going down. Steadily. For years.

You can drop it even more if you end the drug war.

We like guns. And we hate child murder. Anyone would. But we just don't think we ought to do ANYTHING POSSIBLE to prevent it.

You can't even prevent violence in prisons where ALL your rights are suspended.

Reasonable steps to limit violence are a good thing, but we're already taking them, and THEY WORK.

So chill.

The U.S. is on the metric system, it's just not mandatory, meaning things like contracts and road signs can be metric, and some are, but it's not required.

"Facebook friends" might just be people you met once, or not even that.

Rolling in his grave, I imagine.

I'm trying to wrap my brain around how a principal could be so stupid. It's a public computer that gets passed around. I wouldn't look at *regular* porn on that thing. Nor would I visit a banking web site (yes it's HTTPS, but boot keyloggers exist).