Comment Re:Mod Parent Up Please - Correct! (Score 1) 970
That is absolutely correct. I tested prototype printers for about 5 years and I can guarantee that when you buy a printer, the cartridges that it comes with are half-filled at best.
That is absolutely correct. I tested prototype printers for about 5 years and I can guarantee that when you buy a printer, the cartridges that it comes with are half-filled at best.
Exactly.
Apple is playing both sides here. Either their app store is safe, or it isn't.
If it isn't safe, 90% of their excuse for not allowing people to download apps from anyone is nonsense.
Other 10% (in 2% increments):
1) Money
2) MONEY
3) Mo-ney
4) ???
5) Profit!
Liberty died the minute Reagan came to power and the "moral majority" and corporate powers took over Washington.
No, liberty was dying a death of a thousand cuts before Reagan.
Falcon
It's not that hard to do high-definition monochrome TV. You just need to crank up the horizontal sweep rate and use higher-bandwidth amplifiers. Color, though, requires more holes in the shadow mask or stripes on the screen, and the alignment tolerances are tighter.
France had 819-line monochrome broadcast TV in the 1950s. But with the transition to color around 1960, Europe went to a uniform 625 lines. Kind of sad, but making special color TV tubes for France just wasn't worth the trouble.
The only Nvidia card costing $500 is the GTX295, well at least for the market we are discussing. It's still quicker and slicker than any of ATI's current offerings so why, pray tell, would you be trying to mix it with an ATI at this point? I have one and, well, couldn't imagine any reason to waste RAM/CPU on multiple video drivers.
If you are talking about getting a $500 video card and sticking it on a board with integrated video, well, you've got some priority issues that you'll have to work out on your own.
Which is precisely why corporate CEOs - and sundry other people at the top of various food chains - are likely to be the least ethical people you're going to meet. Ethically ambiguous people are thus more capable of making decisions that maximize profit, in true the-end-justifies-the-means fashion.
As a civilization, then, we're hypocrites: we talk a lot about ethics and rights and equality and such, but then THESE are the people we promote to the highest levels of both business and government. Is it any wonder all the talk goes unrewarded and stays largely just talk? Look at how many millions of people were, and are still, convinced that either Bush or Obama are actually ethical.
If we really wanna change the world, we'll have to first change the criteria we're using that allow such ethically unsound people to always wind up in positions making decisions for all the rest of us.
Enzymes are things invented by biologists that explain things which otherwise require harder thinking. -- Jerome Lettvin