"Upon information and belief, Joe Herrington is a person with special needs," the lawsuit said. "Despite such knowledge, Defendant failed to properly train Joe Herrington before, and while, Joe Herrington performed his duties as Defendant's employee."

But you assume they are an "illegal alien border crosser" who doesn't speak english, not because you are racist of course just an honest mistake any non-racist could make.

You asked for a single example.

If one example is meaningless because of mean time between failures then why the fuck did you ask for one?

To send the mesage "We are so confident that in our intelligence that we know all the tech on it and don't need to take a look and see at it".

Which tends to cause bouts of paranoia in counter intelligence services and that causes purges which do more harm to your opposition than the benefit from downing it.

I don't think the technical details matter, you can just ignore the tech babble you don't care about.

There was a bug of some sort in X.Org Server, to make that still work the kernel (the operating system level code) disabled whatever it was that the buggy code misused. But it did that by just doing that for every single program whose name starts with "X" .

X.Org Server code has since been changed to not do that, but the kernel still has that work around, so any other programs that happen to start with the letter X trigger the silly kernel code.

> No, it makes you a drug dealer. "The first hit is free, try it out, no strings attached, honest!".

Could you direct to where I find those amazing drug dealers?

> The fact one even has to consider how to 'take their data with them' (export APIs) means there is a lock-in for non-technical users.

A non technical user just drag and drops the folder from the google drive into a local folder and lets it copy while they do other things.

His offer is $54/share, the current share price is $43. The board would get sued into oblivion by the shareholders if they just let him back out.

"I took X and I got better" is anecdotal evidence. There are plenty of people who took Ivermectin and got better - so there is certainly anecdotal evidence.

Most people who get covid get better with or without taking Ivermectin, so it's completely useless, but it is by definition anecdotal evidence.

> It's also "blind belief" - people seem to think that if they see it on the news, it MUST be true. After all, it's the news!

That doesn't seem to be the case at all, for example: https://news.gallup.com/poll/3... and https://news.gallup.com/poll/3...

Of course there's a chunk of people who declare that the "mainstream news is fake" while believing anything a giant news company tells them to.

From the very start. "Do your own research" is just shorthand for "ignore the research done by experts in that field".

What dos balancing power have to do me with running my personal natural gas generator for hours every day?

It's not a backup generator at that point, it's your primary power supply.

But why not just own the original currency? What's the benefit owning the pegged crypto and hoping and praying the peg isn't a sham?

Sometimes there's 1 minute somewhere in the first third, and one minute somewhere in the last third.

No you would not. Transport is trivial.

I suspect AARP has some idea about how to market to old people.

And that makes it OK?

Ted Bundy raped a murdered dozens of women so we just ignore anyone who "only" rapes and murders one person???