The Ride Share services were intended to use excess capacity of cars when the owner was willing and able to drive. Or to put it another way, guys make a few bucks with their car when they're not working their regular job.
Unless Uber or Lyft prohibits drivers from leaving their service, it seems to be a personal decision by the car owner/driver to determine if the money they get in exchange for sharing their car is worth it.
In the old days, it was better. A lot has changed since the old days.
Didn't this happen in roughly 1995 already?
Everybody always says the opposite of what they mean.
If they call themselves the "web of trust", then it means exactly the opposite.
Real blockers like uBlock Origin don't try so hard to convince you of what they're doing.
"'m pretty sure both lyft and uber prohibit people from driving for both."
They do not. In Seattle and many other cities drivers display stickers for both and take fares from both.
It's an awful lot of complexity just to make water really hot.
There's got to be a better. Maybe this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Nobody knows who Sean Parker is.
Nobody even remembers what Napster is anymore. C'mon. One sentence.
You are correct. The proper way to disclaim them was to say "we have no idea what these emails are or what they represent,"
...a Cosmic Brownie?
http://cosmicbrownies.littlede...
It was WSJ that broke the story this morning, CNet is summarizing it.
The original article is here.
There are currently a total of 13 extensions available
That's with fringe benefits which are at least 33% of that cost.
So multiple $127k * 0.66 to get their salary... or about $83K per year.
That's not a lot for tech workers in one of the most expensive cities in the US
""Two years ago the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) offered $15,000 to anybody -- literally anybody -- who could come up with an idea to speed up airport security..." writes Popular Science."
So if someone did come up with such a great idea, why not implement it themselves and make more than a relatively paltry $15K for coming up with an idea of that could save millions.
" This is in clear violation of the spirit of the law "
If this was common law, you might have a point.
But there is no "spirit of the law" in tax law nor in corporate contract law. The law is about the "letter of the law.
If you disagree, tell the IRS you won't pay your taxes, because their laws are a "clear violation of the spirit of the US Constitution".
Let us know how that works for you.
"Annoying 'Open PDF In Edge' Default Option Puts Windows 10 Users At Risk "
Only for the few Windows 10 users who use Edge.
You have two types of Windows 10 users... those who use Chrome, and those who still want to use IE.
All power corrupts, but we need electricity.
