In your workplace, meditation is something to make people more productive by enhancing happiness. At Amazon, it's the cheapest-possible means to shave a thin slice off their misery. Because actually caring about their workers enough to treat them as well as other folks in other similar jobs costs too much.
I'm sorry, meditation somehow when used at Amazon is evil, but at other companies is good? That doesn't make sense given that meditation moves the needle in the positive direction no matter the circumstance.
Let's make a thought experiment, shall we? You have a company that performs a service. The service is viewed by society as important. Workers who perform this service face substantial stress and a high rate of burnout, but --- and this is the part where one's imagination comes in --- are compensated very well monetarily. Despite the financial gains, their stress is a significant problem. Meditation appears to help them cope with that stress and reduces burnout. Win-win because meditation doesn't cost very much to your company.
OK, great. Now let's imagine another scenario. You have a different company that performs a different service. This service is also viewed by society as important. Workers here face substantial stress and a high rate of burnout, but are not compensated very well. Because your company is cost-concious, you seek low-cost ways of improving the well-being of your workers. Meditation appears to help them cope with the stress of their jobs and reduces burnout. Is this not still win-win?
Or, back to our actual example of Amazon, is absolutely everything they do fundamentally poisoned even though the same actions elsewhere are lauded?