Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Submission + - These Birds Learn Their Mother's Calls Before They Hatch (forbes.com)

grrlscientist writes: A recently-published study reveals that nestlings of Australia’s Red-backed Fairy-wrens learn their mother’s calls before they hatch. These calls are a “vocal password” that the parents rely upon to identify their chicks. Thus, parent birds invest more effort into raising nestlings whose calls are most similar to their own.

Submission + - Acoustic Scarecrows: A Humane, Non-Lethal Way To Reduce Bird Strikes? (forbes.com)

grrlscientist writes: This newsstory discusses an innovative technology that uses a non-lethal method to convince birds and wildlife to stay away from airports, and other places where they're not wanted. This "acoustic scarecrow" thereby reduces the risk of a bird or wildlife strike, with an annual savings of millions of dollars, and hundreds of human lives.

Submission + - What Is Coral Bleaching, And Why Is It On The Rise? (forbes.com)

grrlscientist writes: Every day, we hear about coral bleaching, but exactly what it is is not discussed, nor is it explained why coral bleaching is increasing around the world. This piece is a basic primer that addresses these issues, providing the reader with accessible, essential information so he or she can better understand the basic biology of corals and how that is impacted by global warming.

Comment Re:my submission was plagiarised. (Score 1) 123

as community members, we have the responsibility to make sure that the powers-that-be act in accordance to the guidelines they set forward. they should not be allowed to act in a random way, nor to act unethically, nor to act against their own stated policies. so first, because slashdot accepts forbes submissions in other topics the board, even within the week, why did they randomly decide to not accept this particular one? and further, why did they decide to sneakily substitute a different URL -- thereby plagiarising my name, and my words, and erroneously implying that i endorsed that inferior submission, instead of creating a new submission of their own? why did they sneak in to the database yesterday and silently change their substituted URL to the forbes "welcome" page when that was NOT the URL i submitted, either? why not change the database BACK to the actual URL that i submitted and apologise for their misbehaviour, especially since i added the expunged URL to an upthread comment where it was easily seen? oh, and don't forget, but the editors should tell me, SHOULD TELL US ALL, publicly, why did they delete my message that i posted here, in this very thread, yesterday? as slashdot states at the beginning of each story's comments: "The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way." that statement implies that the editors will neither edit nor delete any comments, yet they CLEARLY DO -- when the comments displease them by, say, calling them out for their lack of transparency and for their misbehaviour. and, as a community member who would like to be part of a reputable site, why am i supposed to "shut up" -- as one commenter told me to do upthread -- when i notice these egregious discrepancies, when i have done absolutely nothing wrong by commenting publicly upon them? oh, and one last thing -- this is just for the editors at slashdot: i've taken a screenshot of this comment and will happily repost it if you decide to sneakily delete it as you did with yesterday's comment.

Slashdot Top Deals

Lawrence Radiation Laboratory keeps all its data in an old gray trunk.

Working...