OOXML Vote Tracker and Calculation Guide 66
Andy Updegrove writes "The vote on Microsoft's OOXML closes today. The final result will not be announced (or leak) before sometime early next week. Meanwhile the votes of individual countries continue to come in, currently with more reported switching in favor of OOXML than against it. For the benefit of those who want to keep track of how the vote is tending until it's official, I'm posting the running tally of which votes have switched, what the net change has been, now many votes have come to light, and how many remain to be announced. It's likely that it will not be possible to know the final result until all votes are in, due to the complex double test for approval, and the complication that the final number of abstentions — and whether they move from 'yes' or 'no' votes — can decrease the total number of votes that need to switch to 'yes' in order for OOXML to be approved. For that reason, I also include the algorithm for arriving at a final result."
Re:Why is it tolerated? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Who says it is tolerated? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:I know OOXML is going to go through (Score:5, Insightful)
That being said... You only have to lie once and all future statements you make are tainted by doubt. The question has moved beyond ODF vs OOXML but to ISO itself. The ISO is like a bank in that their product is trust. The same way I trust the bank to hold my money, I'm supposed to trust that things certified by ISO deserve to have been certified. But if this passes, how can I do that? How can ISO survive in the face of having allowed itself and it's processes to be so transparently perverted? And not just by anyone, but by a known abusive monopolist which has proven for over twenty years that there is no lie it won't tell and no back it won't stab to get it's way?
I trust that buying film & photo paper whose boxes are labelled "ISO 9001 Certified" means I'm getting a well-made product. How can I trust any ISO standards after this? If this happens, Microsoft will truly be the destroyer of standards.
ISO Standards for Sale (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Voting irregularities (Score:2, Insightful)
Remember this... (Score:5, Insightful)
Anybody who thinks otherwise is naive.
Re:Why is it tolerated? (Score:3, Insightful)
ISO's credibility is shot. Period. When its NB's do whatever they can to approve a specification that is technically and legally impossible to implement, just because one company tells them to, I say ISO is dead in the water. Its work has just lost all meaning.
The NB's went to ridiculous lengths to pass OOXML. We've seen small companies joining commitees in drones days before the vote and voting to approve without any kind of justification; we've seen commitee chairs openly lobbying OOXML and spreading Microsoft propaganda; we've seen overwhelming opposition simply shut out, rules changed on the fly and generally doing everything but dancing naked on a pole just so that OOXML is passed.
Fuck ISO. I cannot believe how wide open they were to this kind of abuse. It was like shooting fish in a barrel. And the second they pass OOXML under these conditions, "ISO certified" transforms to shit. Who's to say what other ISO "standards" in the future won't be passed this way? An ISO standard used to mean something. Now it doesn't mean anything.
Thank you, Microsoft, for destroying a global organization. If after this anybody still doesn't believe that Microsoft will fuck up anything as long as it's good for them, they're cracked in the head.