Judge Rules Sites Can Be Sued Over Design 709
BcNexus writes "According to the Associated Press, a California judge has ruled that a lawsuit brought against the Target Corporation may proceed under the Americans with Disabilities Act. The catch here is that the suit, leveled by the National Federation of the Blind, concerns the design of Target's website. Could this set a precedent and subsequent flood of lawsuits against websites? What if another design is not tractable?" From the article: "'What this means is that any place of business that provides services, such as the opportunity to buy products on a website, is now, a place of accommodation and therefore falls under the ADA,' said Kathy Wahlbin, Mindshare's Director of User Experience and expert on accessibility. 'The good news is that being compliant is not difficult nor is it expensive. And it provides the additional benefit of making accessible web sites easier for search engines to find and prioritize.'"
this is just the beginning (Score:1, Funny)
And in other news... (Score:2, Funny)
Accessibility (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Flash (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Why (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Flash (Score:2, Funny)
One crucial point not addressed by the ruling (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Flash (Score:4, Funny)
Solution: M$ Word Intraweb. (Score:3, Funny)
Putting their best spin on recent web news, Microsoft spokesvole Andy Nonymous told reporters gathered at a press conference about M$'s radical new Interweb.
"For years we've been telling the free software terrorists that they were bad for business and their work was hurting disabled people and killing puppies, this drives the point home."
"We stood silent as Sendmail replaced the far more disable friendly US Post Office, but formulated a plan." At this he cackled like a fiend. "We made M$ Word the default editor for email, though most people rejected this. It really hurt us to see the demise of 3m word attachments as a means of conveying 1k of text."
"As Apache on Linux [netcraft.com] took over the world wide web, we were stunned and shaken that people who wanted to stay in business avoided our IIS unless we paid them to use it."
"It was in Mass. that we finally realized that our email strategy right all along. M$ Word is the only blind free format in existence and we are now pressing for it's use as a standard for all interweb pages! This is indeed the cheap and easy solution the good people at Mindcraft are talking about. Victory at last."
A stunned silence settled on the conference. One or two hands came up but and Nonymous nodded off stage.
A huge, sweaty, bald man with a chair then danced onto the stage carrying a $2,000, 75lb office chair raised over his head. "Any questions?" he asked through a truly demented grin [google.com]. And there were none. He had fucking killed them.
Re:S-T-U-P-I-D (Score:3, Funny)
Read this comment [slashdot.org]. The author is right on the money.
lifetime appointment judges
This is an entirely different topic, though I totally agree with you.
Re:One crucial point not addressed by the ruling (Score:3, Funny)
Re:This is Dangerous (Score:2, Funny)
oh please oh please lets do that one!! Cool eh?
Re:This is Dangerous (Score:2, Funny)
No, it just means there's more websites for you to sue
Step 1: be born differently than 99% of the population
Step 2: make the other 99% bend over backwards to accomedate for my disability and if they don't, sue!
Step 3: profit!
This makes me soooo not proud to be an american.
There is a silver lining though: if they do make all business sites capable for screen readers to navigate than that means cellphones, pdas and other portable devices should be able to reformat the website for easier viewing on smaller screens or even reading them outloud. Maybe someday you can "call" a website and hear it over the phone and make selections that way.