Net Neutrality Is Just "Mumbo Jumbo" 362
Ergasiophobia writes "It seems the National Cable & Telecommunications Association is spreading a blatant lie in the form of a commercial claiming that the net neutrality act will cost the consumer more and that it is 'bad' for the consumer. This, of course, ignores how much the cable companies will profit from the act's defeat. For some truthful information on the net neutrality act check out savetheinternet.com" This honestly seems too stupid to actually be real. Anyone know for sure?
Text version, because Flash sucks. (Score:5, Informative)
Makes Microsoft's FUD look a bit tame by comparison.
Re:I'm suspicious of net "neutrality". (Score:1, Informative)
Re:I'm suspicious of net "neutrality". (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Real? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:What's real? (Score:3, Informative)
And of course they tout their "better" internet service, when in fact they have the only network LESS reliable than the crappy AT&T DSL here.
In chicagoland our phone (SBC, now AT&T) seems actually worse than cable at the greasing the pockets and buying the regulators bit, but clearly they're both very guilty. One AT&T thing I really love is that they were ordered to let anybody sell phone service and DSL service on their lines... but you can't do BOTH on a line - if you want third party DSL you MUST have AT&T phone. (Excluding dry line services which are thankfully cheaper now, but previously didn't exist as a residential service.)
Re:Real? (Score:4, Informative)
b) I'm so happy I live in the UK, where I'm spared ads like that. Even the worst ads here are nowhere near as dumbed down (that ad talks down to people on so many levels) or expressly politicised as that.
Re:I love the media! (Score:3, Informative)
Does the USA not have a similar body?
Re:Real? (Score:1, Informative)