Policy Wonk Castigates Net Neutrality 322
An anonymous reader writes "Tom Giovanetti, president of the Dallas, Texas based public policy think tank Institute for Policy Innovation envisions a chaotic world as a result of Net Neutrality. He says a flood of undiscriminated traffic to and from Youtube, Coldplay, and Victoria's Secret will bring down the Internet, leading to failures of IPTV, VOIP, and emergency services which depend on VOIP. Is he right or wrong?." From the article: "... government should be about fostering a dynamic and risk-taking economy, not preserving the certainty of anyone's business models. Net neutrality regulations would severely restrict broadband providers' right to enter into contracts and to try new business models while protecting the business models of Google and Ebay." Compare this with George Ou's commentary on this subject from yesterday.
Wonk? (Score:0, Funny)
Now good day!
Re:MY HEAD ACHES NOW (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Most emergency services also have radio. (Score:2, Funny)
24 minutes per hour
7 hours per day
52 days per year
Re:Justifiable Reasoning (Score:3, Funny)
But if I ask myself for an answer to the question, it's no longer rhetorical. Must... not... answer... (*head explodes*)
Seriously though, this internet thing was a bad idea from the start. It's a good thing that a tiered system can develop to prune the chaff of the internet away. In an ideal world, the internet would consist of MSN, Fox News and Ann Coulter praising blogs. None of this slashdot, dailykos, or other free thinking blog crap. MySpace would still exist, just so law enforcement can catch all those idiot liberals who post their crime exploits on there. (Wish they'd do something about the color schemes though.) People nowadays have too much freedom anyways, and should just do what they're told. Friggin liberals.
[end sarcasm]
Sorry, couldn't resist.