Getting on Top of Spam Down Under 128
The Register is reporting that Australia has implemented a new industry code for the regulation of email with respect to spam. From the article: "Under the new code, internet service providers (ISPs) will bear some of the responsibility for helping fight spam. Service providers must offer spam-filtering options to their subscribers and advise them on how to best deal with and report the nuisance mail. ISPs will also be compelled to impose 'reasonable' limits on subscribers' sending email."
Re:Agh (Score:2, Informative)
There was a newsletter I caught recently talking about some of the successful prosecutions for spam 'downunder'. It sounds like they are making progress.
The full text of that newsletter is here. [360is.com]
Nick.
Unimpressed. (Score:5, Informative)
Anyway, back on topic, here's [theage.com.au] an article from a local paper - it contains a link to the actual code of practice [acma.gov.au] (pdf warning)
Re:Hows does it define SPAM ? (Score:3, Informative)
Here you go [acma.gov.au] (pdf warning)
It's not legislation, but a code of practice (a sort of howto follow the legislation). from the linked pdf: I'll dig up the 2003 legislation, but you will be sorely dissapointed when I do, as our lying, Saddam-conspiring, refugee hating, spamming bastard of a prime minister is a spammer himself [theage.com.au]
hear, hear (Score:3, Informative)
As more and more people put SPF into their DNS, the punishment for a message not having it can increase. In turn, then, more and more people put SPF into their DNS.
Let's get the ball rolling!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sender_Policy_Framewo rk [wikipedia.org]