Negroponte's Talk at Emerging Technology Conference

xacting writes "The video of Nicholas Negroponte's talk about MIT's One Laptop per Child (OLPC) research initiative was just posted to MIT World. In it, he discusses the challenges of tripling the world's laptop production, dealing with China's policies towards free speech and the problems of grey markets." From the article: "The key to churning out these cheap educational devices is volume -- and the more countries that join the bandwagon, the sleeker and less expensive the computers are likely to be. Negroponte casts a wary eye on the potential grey market appeal of the machines, and is determined to make them so distinctive as a government-distributed, educational tool that taking one would 'be like stealing a post office truck.' Negroponte concludes, 'Changing education on the planet is a monumental challenge,' taking decades. But OLPC will 'seed the change,' and help 'invent the future.'"

Re:The good ole' Death Squad Torturer

[lobsterGun]

That's all well and good... but that has nothing to do with the man behind the $100 laptop.

The $100 laptop guy is Nicholas Negroponte.

The former abasador to Honduras is John Negroponte.

They are different people.

Q's & A's to the posters who don't bother to w

[maggard]

Since most of the posters seem woefully under-informed (you DID watch the video before posting?) here are responses to a few of the silly comments that have already come up:

• Q: Why stop these US$100 laptops from being sold?
  A: They're not. Quantas, their manufacturer, is free to sell the same item to anyone. However those commercial versions cost will be closer to US$200.

• Q: Why is this only for 3rd World places?
  A: It's not, the State of Massachusetts and others are already committed to large purchases. Why not get your community involved?

• Q: Why insist on targeted distribution?
  A: Because all the research shows that 'seeding' 1 per 5 kids or whatever doesn't have the same network effect (figuratively & literally) that ubiquitous use in an area does.

• Q: Why do these kids need laptops? Why not food/water/medicine?
  A: They need all of those, and those are vital things to see they get. But once those immediate needs are met the long term goal of providing an education is what will help these kids and their communities be self-sufficient, indeed able to assist other neighboring communities.

• Q: Where's the software for this?
  A: It's Redhat Linux, this is /., are you serious? OK, less inflammatory answer: With a standard cheap platform out there individuals, organizations, governments, and the communities receiving these will be able to develop what they can take advantage of.

• Q: So what's to keep unscrupulous folks from buying these out the back door of warehouses?
  A: First the local communities will likely look down on this theft of their resources pretty intensely. Second the goal is to make any trade in these universally unsavory. Will it be 100% effective? No. But this is an easy issue to rally behind and the $100 models will be distinctive from their commercial kin.

And if Every Geek

[Nik Picker]

Sponsored at least one laptop .. how many more laptops could be paid for ?

I wrote to them asking where I could send $100 to sponsor the creation of the laptop.. I was automailed a response.

im still waiting for a real person from their group to answer my question .

Re:Methinks the whole approach is wrong

[mangu]

I live just 3 miles from a major US University, and I don't have any kind of wireless avaiable. Hell, I have exactly (1) choice of broadband. Where are kids in sub-saharan Africa going to get wireless, exactly? How about kids in Bangladesh? The jungles or Uruguay?

Well, I live about 10 km (6 miles) from a major Brazilian slum and I have (5) choices of broadband. I guess you have been watching too much the National Geographic channel and reading too little about geography. BTW, Uruguay is the "second-smallest South American country (after Suriname); most of the low-lying landscape (three-quarters of the country) is grassland, ideal for cattle and sheep raising" [cia.gov] . There are no jungles there.