The Wikipedians Who Make it Happen 236
Phoe6 writes "Many of us might have wondered who these crazy people are, spending lot of time at wikipedia and presenting us with such an invaluable information.
Wired has decided to give some credits to the most active wikipedians, in their article titled Wiki becomes a way of life"
Good for them (Score:4, Interesting)
WTF? Why would you /. Wikipedia? (Score:3, Interesting)
I love the wikipedia, (Score:5, Interesting)
And before you flame on, I DID send a donation.
Wiki (Score:1, Interesting)
There is really nothing to prevent me from going into those submissions and editting my view of the facts. There is nothing preventing someone from taking the other viewpoint.
I am suprised that these entries aren't changing on a minute by minute basis. Everyone wants to write history from their viewpoint.
Re:Wiki (Score:2, Interesting)
I am suprised that these entries aren't changing on a minute by minute basis. Everyone wants to write history from their viewpoint."
yep. [wikipedia.org]
but then (Score:3, Interesting)
Instead we are seen as this kind of human wave that takes down websites.
Maybe it's more eligatarian this way.
Re:Knowledge is democratized? (Score:3, Interesting)
No. The idea that the flat earth theory was ever widely accepted by is a myth. Auguste Compte and others laid the ground work for the "theory" in the 1800s with anti-religious sentiments that overstated the whole idea of "war" between science and religion.
The idea that Colombus was opposed by a vast Flat Earth opposition was invented by Washington Irving in his book on the explorer in 1828. French scholar Antoine-Jean Letronne furthered the myth a few years later.
Re:wikipedia skeptic (Score:3, Interesting)
I just recently discovered Wikipedia and think it is great! The way I found it was through Trillian [ceruleanstudios.com]. When I am in chat Trillian highlights words that have Wikipedia articles. Once I found it I immediately looked up my favorite subject, beer [realbeer.com]! Like you I found many mistakes. Of course I never completely believe anything I read even from so called experts. I still think it is a great site and project. As far as a teacher letting students use it as a source, I would allow it. There are almost as many errors in most text books.
Discussing Wikinews stories (Score:4, Interesting)
I posted a Wikinews story yesterday entitled "CIA Sending Suspects Overseas For 'Rendition' [theworldforum.org]", which received almost 2000 hits due to being displayed on the front page of Google News for most of the day. This helps give Wikinews more readership, since they are not listed in Google News. Sadly, however, it does not result in increased discussion, since most people visiting from Google News are not people interested in posting comments.
Re:Knowledge is democratized? (Score:3, Interesting)
It was the first paragraph that rubbed me the wrong way: ...
So, click on the 'Edit' button which was just a few inches away from the text. Insert a phrase that makes the statement more neutral, without removing details others have added.
If you know why it rubs you the wrong way, what have you got to lose in improving the content?
rambot! (Score:3, Interesting)
I must say I appreciate the Jack Kerouac reference in my hometown's article [wikipedia.org], though.