A few names always tend to crop up in a discussion of this nature.
The advocates are the people who spread the message of Open Source outside of just the guys who read Slashdot and
freshmeat obsessively. Who does it the best?
Nominate the person you feel deserves it most.
Larry Wall (Score:1)
Tom Christiansen (Score:1)
His contributions to Slashdot discussions are always mature, level-headed, and well-reasoned. He is a shining example of what Free Software advocates should be like.
He is always very helpful on #Perl, and is patient with everyone who makes mistakes. This is exactly the sort of person we need as our advocate.
Re:R.E Ballard (Score:1)
Linus (Score:1)
you're right: look at the good *and* the bad side (Score:1)
Most of those who shall remain unnamed did a awfull lot of good advocacy. The bad press they got and the riots they ignited were mostly internal. When RMS and ESR are discussed WE make a lot of fuss about it. WE flame eachother. WE make us seem like a bunch of anarchists. Are they wholly to be blamed for what WE do?
just my 2 dutch cents
Reinout
RMS (Score:1)
I would also give ESR honorable mention - he's providing a necessary function to the "outside world" by journalling the goings-on inside the community.
Terry "LabRat" Dawson (#linuxaus) (Score:1)
Hell, he has gotten me to a stage where I am offering time to do work for GNU.org and soon LDP
--darkewolf@cyberpunks.org [cyberpunks.org]
R.E Ballard (Score:1)
You can view some of Ballard posting history in Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/[ST_rn=ps]/profile.xp?autho
Re:R.E Ballard (Score:1)
http://x33.deja.com/[ST_rn=ap]/dnquery.xp?searc
Regards
Christopher Browne (Score:1)
I don't personally know this guy, but this guy shows up everywhere (usenet, mailing-lists, even slashdot), and he always has something insightful to say. He's so eloquent, too.
I'm surprised he hasn't been mentioned yet. Next to Ballard, I'd go with cbbrowne.
Loki Games (Score:1)
Chris Hagar
ESR is the one! (Score:1)
With his great articles he showed to the world how the open-source model(the Bazaar) functions in contrast to the closed one(the cathedral). Without him the source code of Netscape probably wouldn't be released.
Thanks ESR, for his contributions to us.
The sad fact of the matter is... (Score:1)
Really, I would hate to be the person that would have to pick between Linus, RMS, and ESR.
As for the whole "controversial-so-we-shouldn't-nominate-them" thing, come on. Is there anyone who can sit around all day and talk about linux and not make about everybody mad? No. People that don't make people mad Aren't Talking About Everything. That's fine, but it doesn't necessarily make you a great advocate.
Re:Bruce Perens (Score:1)
There are alot of deserving people out there, but I think this award should definately go to Bruce Perens.
Besides, his last name looks sorta like the word 'Penguins'. Admit it, it does.
Re:ESR is the one! (Score:1)
Microsoft (Score:1)
Without Microsoft to compare to, where would Open Source be? IBM and Sun aren't nearly evil enough.
Tim O'Reilly (Score:1)
--Brett Glass
Re:Bruce Perens (Score:1)
--Brett Glass
john carmack (Score:1)
Re:Terry "LabRat" Dawson (#linuxaus) (Score:1)
Re:Larry Wall (Score:1)
Jon "maddog" Hall (Score:2)
I would, however, retract this nomination if maddog has already received an award for said advocacy.
My nomination is.. (Score:2)
Without the continuous unreliability of their earlier server products, many companies would not know to look for viable alternatives, including (but not limited to) the "Open Source" environments.
Bruce Perens (Score:2)
--
This is a tough one! (Score:2)
(*Satisfied, in this case, can include people who are unhappy with some aspect of the OS of their choice, but believe in it because they can fix whatever it is that's not so great.)