|
|
I would draw the line at cloning...
| 1950 votes / 5% |
| 507 votes / 1% |
| 313 votes / 0% |
| 2196 votes / 5% |
| 3689 votes / 9% |
| 4211 votes / 11% |
| 4280 votes / 11% |
| 20537 votes / 54% |
[ Voting Booth | Other Polls | Back Home ]
- Don't complain about lack of options. You've got to pick a few when you do multiple choice. Those are the breaks.
- Feel free to suggest poll ideas if you're feeling creative. I'd strongly suggest reading the past polls first.
- This whole thing is wildly inaccurate. Rounding errors, ballot stuffers, dynamic IPs, firewalls. If you're using these numbers to do anything important, you're insane.
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Re:Start with human organs (Score:4, Informative)
The broken patent revision process (where patents can be revised at the end of their lifespan with subtly new processes to get the term extended) give holders a way to basically stifle innovation (by sandbagging new advancements) and monopolizing the results (by keeping the patents for decades
Yeah, this is called "Evergreening" [wikipedia.org], and it is all over the modern pharmaceutical industry.