Journal LinuxParanoid's Journal: User-moderated story queue, late-August 2003 7
If you have a story submission that has been neglected in the second half of August 2003, then reply to this post. Submitting stories both here and elsewhere at the same time is fine and encouraged.
Instant messaging blamed for summer movie flops (Score:1, Redundant)
London Independent writes, "executives are not blaming such bombs as The Hulk, Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle or Gigli on poor quality, lack of originality, or general failure to entertain. There's absolutely nothing new about that." What they are blaming it on is instant text messaging, sometimes done in real time right from the movie theater. It seems that hand-held text-message devices has drastically cut down the time it takes for movie-goers to tell their fr
Not having trouble with submissions, myself (Score:2)
I wanted to report -- not bragging, mind you, just reporting -- that I'm not having any trouble getting stories accepted. I've got more details of 2 early failed attempts in my own journal, but I've had 4 successes since then, including this current Science story [slashdot.org]:
Re:Not having trouble with submissions, myself (Score:2)
So a catchy headline is another way to get your story considered -- it's your first impression, and you know what they say about first impressions. They really p*** off the guy pouring the concrete.
Rejected stories and open story queues (Score:2)
I'm glad you're having some success and you bring up some good advice.
I'm really advertising for postings here because A) I'm curious how well/poorly an open story queue would work, and B) a haven for good-but-rejected stories seems like fairly open Slashdot niche that could provide submissions to start the ball rolling.
Other suggestions of course welcome.
--LP
Gwynne Dyer, worth reading (Score:2)
Some of his recent editorials:
Tampa Eliminates Face-Recognition System (Score:2)