Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Facebook

tomhudson's Journal: I keep hearing these social media claims, but no hard proof. 2

Journal by tomhudson

We've all encountered those "web designers" who claim that you need facebook, twitter, whatever "social media web integration". And yet, we all know that you can buy facebook fans for as low as 500 for a buck, that you can buy twitter followers, you can buy google+ friends, you can buy web traffic to give any site a temporary artificial boost and make it look like the social media gimmick is working its magic ...

But where are the hard statistics?

Where are the studies that show that spending $X on "social media" gives a ROI of $Y?

And is the ROI better than if you had just spent the same budget on beer for the office party and returned the empties for the refund? It seems to me that, rather than being a way to add value, it's just something that will turn into an unproductive time sink - just like social media in general. Coincidence? I think not.

Does anyone have hard figures - not anecdotal "evidence" - to the contrary?

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

I keep hearing these social media claims, but no hard proof.

Comments Filter:

The sooner all the animals are extinct, the sooner we'll find their money. - Ed Bluestone

Working...