Journal ryanr's Journal: Handguns for everyone! 2
In further stirring up trouble news:
Judge Overturns Controversial SF Hand Gun Ban
So I think the sane thing happened here, and the [clear to me] Constitutional bit about arms was upheld, against a city popular vote. (Though it was done at a State level so far.)
Plus, you gotta love this sentence from the article:
Measure H was placed on the November ballot by the San Francisco County Board of Supervisors, who were frustrated by an alarmingly high number of gun-related homicides in the city of 750,000.
Wow. Abuse the ambiguity of the English language much?
Somtimes logic wins out I guess? (Score:2)
Glad to see this seems to be going the right way at least for now. But I think California in general is ju
Re:Somtimes logic wins out I guess? (Score:2)
Really, who else would the law affect? No one does a non-concealed carry. So that affects who, private security? Anyone who has a concealed weapon is already committing a crime, unless they have a concealed carry permit. So.. you're banning people who have a concealed carry permit? I don't get it.