Journal sulli's Journal: Attn. Anti-Plan B, Anti-Contraception Moralists 21
You caused an abortion that could easily have been prevented. Morons.
Congratulations! You are the one-millionth user to log into our system. If there's anything special we can do for you, anything at all, don't hesitate to ask!
Like I always say... (Score:2)
At least she could get an abortion. (Score:2)
Not even half of it (Score:2)
The War on Contraception [nytimes.com] (NY Times Magazine)
Um (Score:2)
Oh, I know, you think it is not an abortion. Maybe technically it is not an abortion, but that's just a word: it's not "abortion" that people oppose, it's the willfull and unjustified destruction of what people, reasonably (since it's a biological fact), believe is a unique human life, and that it should be preserved. That is happening whether this is an abortion or not.
So you'
Re:Um (Score:2)
Re:Um (Score:2)
Again, you are missing the point. I just noted that what you call it is irrelevant, because it is not "abortion" that people have a problem with, it is the destruction of human life. And the medical community DOES universally agree that the fertilized egg that is prevented from implanting is a unique human (homo sapiens) life (living organism). There is no dispute on this in the medical com
Re:Um (Score:2)
False. It is not clear, and it is not true: I have no such belief. Work on your straw men, maybe get some practice in.
A chemical reaction between nucleic molecules isn't as convincing to me, personally, as, say, being viable apart from the mother.
So according to you, our technological ability to keep the organism alive outside the womb -- that is what "viability" means -- determines the value of human life? Is that what you're saying? Tha
Re:Um (Score:2)
Hm. Last person who's been so interested in my views on such issues was js7a. You wouldn't be him, by any chance, would you?
Re:Um (Score:2)
Because if you are js7a, you are a known troll to be ignored.
All I'm saying is that I have read your conversations with others on this subject and I would rather not tell you who I am.
Shrug. Then you won't get any answers from me.
Re:Um (Score:2)
Re:Um (Score:2)
Re:Um (Score:2)
Re:Um (Score:2)
Re:Um (Score:2)
How old are you, 12? Do you really think that is a good argument? Do you really not see the difference between actively causing something to be destroyed, and it being destroyed through natural causes? Is there no difference, to you, between murder and death by natural causes?
Re:Um (Score:2)
Re:Um (Score:2)