Journal Louis_Wu's Journal: Multi-computer users, how do we keep everything synced. 3
Microsoft might be right about the concept behind
But why is it that the very thing I'm obsessing over is at the core of Microsoft's strategy? Are they that good? Am I that unlucky?
Basically, my problem is that I use a stringently controlled computer at work, a Linux box at home (which also boots into WinXP for games), and I just added a Mac PowerBook running MacOS X 10.2. So that's three computers, in two locations, with four operating systems. And I want seamless access to email, bookmarks, calendar, addressbook
Maybe my solution is using my Linux box as a server, and ssh-ing to it when I need terminal access. But what about everything else? Even if I use my own box, how do I set up email access & contacts & bookmarking of websites? I can't ssh from my work box, it's pretty obvious that I can't get to my linux partition from the windows partition of the same box. In fact, unless I get myself another computer, the only way that hosting my own solutions would work would be if I was using my powerbook. Sigh.
OK, I'm complaining. I know. But this doesn't really seem like "Ask Slashdot" material, and I don't even know where to start searching for all of this. Well, not quite true. I've looked on Sourceforge for bookmarking solutions, and tried to find email solutions there as well. But I'm not really a programmer (I'm learning perl, but I'm just beginning.), so making sense out of the where the projects are, or what they actually do (as opposed to what they say they want in the description), or how easy they are to use, or how robust
I've thought about rolling my own solution to the bookmarking problem, and I could probably do it in a month or so. But that's just the most obvious symptom to my underlying problem - I want continual access to all of my data, no matter where I am or what kind of computer I'm using. And, to complete the circle, that's just what Microsoft is planning for
Well, I'm off to look for what's been done in the "alternate
Not to bad (Score:1)
The e-mail one is dirt easy to handle. Setup a cheesy machine as a mail server and just set your mail clients to leave all mail on the server. I myself just use my ISPs webmail server, same thing in the end, but if you want to use a client, just go for an independent box.
Heck many people are just taking the path of setting up a single low CPU power high HD storage space box as a sort of uber-server that does everything for them. Stores all of their files (accessible with whatever protocol you want), works as an e-mail server, and stores anything else that you need. Heck if you really want to, setup a script so that when ever you close down Mozilla your bookmarks are exported and uploaded via whatever to your server, guaranteed synch. Upon opening have Mozilla download the bookmarks from your server and load them up.
A few Google searchs later, CuteMarks [sourceforge.net]
Re:Not to bad (Score:1)
The big-dumb-machine sounds like an acceptable solution, but I want a full solution. Sigh. I also want peace on earth. And to lose weight while eating Oreos.
I guess that I'll start looking for hard drives. Hmm, wonder if my old 486 could handle the job. Oh, whoops, I forgot that the BIOS has a 500 meg limit built in. But the case is sure big. HEY! Now I can justify building a system. "I have to shop for parts, to make it cheap. But I need tons of storage." Mmmm, new computer.
Re:Not to bad (Score:1)
A good Motherboard is well around $70 or so, add on a separate PCI IDE controler to ensure that you definitely have enough HD space, pop in a $60 or so AMD CPU, and you have yourself a box.
(You do have a spare video card and NIC and all that sitting around right? I mean who doesn't have a box full of NICs sitting under their desk. . .