Journal tf23's Journal: The Roberts nomination 6
Let me get this straight:
1) no paper trail of opinions
2) 2 years of experience being a judge
Hmm. Seems enough to be put on the highest court in the land!
Not!
Let me get this straight:
1) no paper trail of opinions
2) 2 years of experience being a judge
Hmm. Seems enough to be put on the highest court in the land!
Not!
Cobol programmers are down in the dumps.
Well known in Washington Republican circles (Score:2)
Re:Well known in Washington Republican circles (Score:2)
Also, Sandra Day O'Connor had only six years as a judge, and none in federal court, when she was nominated; Roberts has substantially more experience in the federal courts than she did. It is not uncommon for a Supreme Court nominee to have little-or-no exp
Can you explain his membership in the Federalists? (Score:2)
Re:Can you explain his membership in the Federalis (Score:2)
Re:Can you explain his membership in the Federalis (Score:2)
You said he was "merely well-known", implying he wasn't a Republican insider.
Well, I believe my link shows he IS a Republican insider.
Now you can tell me t
Re:Can you explain his membership in the Federalis (Score:2)
Ah, you misunderstood. I implied no such thing. What I stated is that how well-known he is extends beyond Republican circles, and I implied nothing beyond that. And then I went on to explain some of the ways he is well-known that extend beyond Republican circles, to drive home that one and only point.
Now you can tell me that you feel being a Republican insider is innocuous.
I don't know what that means, specifically to be a