Journal metlin's Journal: Software Patents & Slashdot Group-think 5
Ah, yet another pristine example of the Slashdot groupthink.
For some odd reason, they cannot accept the fact that there maybe genuine folks out there who could use software patents.
Not to mention the fact that half the folks do not know the difference between patents and copyrights or the requirements and pre-requisites for getting the patent.
Nope, but we will however say things like, "I doubt you have ever been involved in a court case, never mind a patent infringement lawsuit." and mod-down those whom we disagree with rather than argue.
Bah, am just ranting. Fucking asshats.
But why oh why can't people see that there MAY be someone out there for whom something maybe beneficial? Perhaps it doesn't agree with your worldview, but that doesn't make it wrong.
Am serious here - am I the only one who seems to think that perhaps there is another side to things, too? It's disappointing to see one sided and biased arguments.
Utilitarian argument (Score:2)
Article 33 of TRIPS (Score:3, Insightful)
What morons! Faced with idiocy like this, you have to pick no software patents, because a twenty+ year patent protection could easily make those who are not part of a patent cross-licensing legal cartel inviable.
Groupthink (Score:2)
Nope, but we will however say things like, "I doubt you have ever been involved in a court case, never mind a patent infringement lawsuit." and mod-down those whom we disagree with rather than argue.
What positions are they moding down?
But why oh why can't people see that there MAY be someone out there for whom somethi