Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

[ Create a new account ]

Build Your Own Set Top Box

Posted by CmdrTaco on Wed Jan 31, 2001 03:45 PM
from the i-want-my-hdtv dept.
Kon writes "There is a lot of talk lately about how Divx and other type codecs will spawn a new industry upsurge in the manufacturing of player hardware. But what is the purpose of buying hardware when you can build your own? The only limitation is the software, but projects like Media-BOX and the Divx Project will hopefully change this ;-). And why stop with Divx, when you could potentially use this cheap home-made box to handle everything from games to HDTV (via HD tuner board) to Mp3s? Food for thought." Media-Box is Windows only, but its a long ways along. And that divx site, well, I can't read it. But this stuff is looking really excellent. I'm still itching for the Linux equivelant. I wrote a decent MP3 wrapper, but still want the online browser/tivo/mp3/dvd box. Its inevitable, but it won't happen soon enough.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Build Your Own Set Top Box | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 143 comments (Spill at 50!) | Index Only | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1) | 2
  • by Shoeboy (16224) on Wednesday January 31 2001, @11:03AM (#466110) Homepage
    Ok, first off you're going to need some sand. Lots of sand.
    Next get some bauxite ore and some copper ore. We're going to use aluminum interconnects, so the copper will only be used for the motherboard.
    First off, take the sand and use it to form a silicon wafer 12 inches in diameter. (Note, previous versions of this howto specified 8 inch wafers - these will work, but your cost/chip will be much higher.
    Next, purify the bauxite ore to create an ingot of pure alluminum.
    Ok, now we're ready to create the general purpose microprocessor at the heart of our set top box. Using the alluminum, the wafer, a magnifying glass and a laser pointer, create a 6 issue wide superscalar 64 bit microprocessor with at least 256 KB of l2 cache. For best results, try to keep the feature size at .18 microns or below. You may have to try a few times to get this right.
    Be sure to have a very clean environment for this as microprocessor cores are very succeptible to dust. Your garage is not suitable unless you give it a thorough cleaning first.
    Now that you have the microprocessor, the next step is to package it. It is important to use a pin grid array rather than a ball grid array as you may wish to upgrade the processor later.

    *rest of guide clipped for space reasons, but you can get the latest version from the linux documentation project [linuxdoc.org].*

    --Shoeboy
  • indrema by gzenker (Score:1) Thursday February 01 2001, @06:44PM
  • Re:Its not as hard as you might think. by spood (Score:1) Friday February 02 2001, @08:54AM
  • I already did! by SuperSnail 2000 (Score:2) Wednesday January 31 2001, @02:27PM
  • Re:Radeon? by Amnesiak (Score:1) Friday February 02 2001, @10:40AM
  • by Hanno (11981) on Wednesday January 31 2001, @02:52PM (#466115) Homepage
    Hi,

    I've been hunting high and low for a decent, small box-sized PC-compatible computer for about a year now. Trouble is, here in Germany it is close to impossible to get one unless you are willing to pay about 3 to 4 times the price of a normal computer with similar components.

    - I first tried to build the box with a normal desktop case, but not only was it ugly, it was also quite loud. My dream machine is a PC-compatible system that looks like a stereo component and that is silent.

    - vanilla, plain set top box hardware is hard to get in Germany if all you want is a quantity of "one".

    - those few set top boxes being sold are proprietary and come with long-term contracts, so hacking them is not an option. We did not have an "iOpener" happening here, yet.

    - there are very few "small" computers on sale over here. Those you can get usually are "thin clients" like the Dell Onmiplex or the Compaq Desktop iPaq that are not equipped with a TV out.

    - Looking at its specs, the Multitainer [fujitsu-siemens.com] is my dream machine, but it appears to have been a massive failure. I tested it at my local electronics store and it had a lot of stability problems. Also, it is curious that I cannot get a *new* machine anywhere in Hamburg (one of the major German cities). The few stores that want to sell the Multitainer all have "returned" devices from unsatisfied customers - still for a price tag of 1000 to 1250 dollars.

    - I once had a hold on a bki810 [amptron.com] computer. It was really nice, except that a) it was not upgradable with more recent CPUs and b) its TV out was sub-par. But my main problem: It was LOUD! It had the noise level of a vacuum cleaner! I tried to replace the fans, but no chance: Local electronics stores did not offer silent fans for that size...

    - I've phoned down the local listing of office suppliers for small computers, but none could help me.

    - I've also checked the very popular electronics classifieds, the local German eBay-style sites etc. Noone seems to sell used hardware.

    After all these attempts, my summary of the problems with "build your own set-top box" is:

    * Normal PC hardware is too loud. And surprisingly, some thin clients are, too.

    * Few thin clients have a TV out or can be equipped with one.

    * Those few thin clients that have a TV out offer a lousy picture quality, usually off-centered or not full-screen on a PAL TV. Yes, I've tried several TV out cards and none of them could come near my very cheap DVD player's TV out. Is it really that difficult?

    All in all, I just wish the Multitainer would have been better. It's everything you'd need: Standard PC hardware components and a clever combination of stereo and video connectors. But apparently, it had engineering problems.

    ------------------
  • Re:More BS MS bashing.... by SuperSnail 2000 (Score:1) Friday February 02 2001, @01:42PM
  • Re:Build your own by Rick the Red (Score:1) Friday February 02 2001, @09:49PM
  • BookPC...made by PCChips consortium... by MsGeek (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @03:02PM
  • Re:It should be noted... by donnek (Score:1) Saturday February 03 2001, @07:47AM
  • Re:It is harder than you think! by mduell (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @03:09PM
  • Re:Build your own by davidu (Score:2) Wednesday January 31 2001, @03:14PM
  • Re:Build your own by maggard (Score:2) Wednesday January 31 2001, @03:18PM
  • Re:BookPC makes good DivX, mp3,..., Mame player by Croaker (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @03:42PM
  • Re:Avifile by bfree (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @03:46PM
  • Re:It's gottan be big by K8Fan (Score:2) Wednesday January 31 2001, @04:16PM
  • HDTV Tuner != cheap by Amnesiak (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @11:07AM
  • Re:It's gottan be big by sik puppy (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @11:08AM
  • News from divx project by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @11:08AM
  • Re:This has other uses as well... by wafath (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @11:08AM
  • On the off chance that that's not a troll... by Booker (Score:2) Wednesday January 31 2001, @11:08AM
  • Re:Its not as hard as you might think. by Bitsy Boffin (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @04:16PM
  • Re:Divx dies for a reason... by qqaz (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @04:39PM
  • Re:Avifile by crlf (Score:2) Wednesday January 31 2001, @04:54PM
  • Re:I recently built one by 1Oman (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @05:06PM
  • Re:What about Make your own ReplayTV - PTV links by Speare (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @05:11PM
  • by WebCowboy (196209) on Wednesday January 31 2001, @05:17PM (#466136)
    For a set-top sized box, I would use the NLX form factor. This is an industry standard by the same people responsible for ATX, but it's better. All desktops should be NLX because ATX REALLY SUCKS for anything but towers. The only (very unfortunate) drawback is that NLX seems to be harder to find despite being superior to micro/mini ATX for compact systems.

    NLS motherboards are about 20 by 25-30 cm (8 by 10 or 11 inches). They have no slots and an edge connector on one side that plugs into the slot of an acocmpanying riser card. PCI cards plug in horizontally--parallel to the motherboard.

    Many NLX cases (and industrial racks) allow the motherboard to be removed by loosening 2 thumbscrews. To add DIMMs, you can pull out the motherboard out COMPLETELY without removing ANY cards or cables--sometimes without even opening the case! Yeong-Yang makes a pretty little VCR-sized NLX case [yeongyang.com]. NLX desktop cases are compact, quiet and easy to maintain (No, I don't sell them. I just think they are neat.)

    As for the NLX motherboards, they usually come with matching riser cards. Asus, Gigabyte or Intel should have them, although they are not as common as ATX and may cost a bit more. The rest is just normal commodity hardware (TV tuner/capture, DVD player, huge hard drive etc.).

    I have been thinking of building such a system for a year or two now. Maybe someone else will try now...
  • Done with X (Score:3)

    by heroine (1220) on Wednesday January 31 2001, @05:26PM (#466137) Homepage
    Eventually there will be no computer monitor or keyboard. You'll hook your computer to a TV set, like the old days, except now there will be no window interface, command line, or multitasking.

    It'll be pure menus, pointing and clicking for everything using a remote control. If you want a box with keyboard and monitor you'll have to go to Cray or something and pay through the nose.

    It looks like when he says "TV out card" he's referrering to the RCA output on most VGA cards. There are lots of "TV out cards" but they use JPEG compression.

    The problem with watching movies this way is you have to go from 24fps progressive to genlocked 29.97fps interlaced. Simply using a Microsoft media player on a TV would cause studdering because it wouldn't match the 29.97 interlacing exactly.
  • This has other uses as well... by 11thangel (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @10:49AM
  • Re:First Toast by unitron (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @05:40PM
  • Re:Building custom set-top boxes might be importan by WebCowboy (Score:2) Wednesday January 31 2001, @05:52PM
  • What about Make your own ReplayTV by Cspine (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @10:50AM
  • Re:So where *is* the hardware? by unitron (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @05:56PM
  • There already is a pretty neat project. by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @11:08AM
  • It's time for the Linux Media Server by Paul Bristow (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @11:10AM
  • Who's gonna do HDTV? by Bistromat (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @11:12AM
  • Re:we need to take up a collection by Gorgonzola (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @11:14AM
  • Can't read the divx site? by Big Brass Balls (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @11:15AM
  • by Ian Wolf (171633) on Wednesday January 31 2001, @11:16AM (#466148) Homepage
    My best friend and I are making our own Linux home entertainment system. So far we are progressing nicely, in fact it isn't quite as difficult as we originally thought.

    Right now, we have a marginally stable...
    DVD Player
    TV Tuner
    MP3 Ripper/Player
    CD Player

    And we hope to get...
    video capture and playback
    infrared receiver for standard remote control
    Try these links for...

    Linux support for the Creative Dxr DVD Decoder and drive. http://opensource.creative.com [creative.com]
    Linux and infrared remote control http://www.lirc.org/ [lirc.org]
    Linux and the ATI all in Wonder cards http://www.linuxvideo.org/gatos/ [linuxvideo.org]
  • Re:Why limit to the Set-Top? by unitron (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @06:09PM
  • Set Top box.... by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @06:16PM
  • Vanu Inc by Mike_K (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @07:11PM
  • Radeon? by rattid (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @07:28PM
  • Anyone know of portable MP3 (HDD based) projects? by -Harlequin- (Score:2) Wednesday January 31 2001, @07:28PM
  • Re:A tale from someone who tried... by -Harlequin- (Score:2) Wednesday January 31 2001, @08:02PM
  • I can't spell by -Harlequin- (Score:2) Wednesday January 31 2001, @08:04PM
  • Generic set-top boxes by Animats (Score:2) Wednesday January 31 2001, @08:16PM
  • Re:Playstation 2 by dan_bethe (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @08:17PM
  • Open Source Tivo? by rossjudson (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @11:16AM
  • DiVx/VCD/DVD/MP3/CD/TIVO/WEB CASE! by WDHQ (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @11:16AM
  • Re:Divx dies for a reason... by mfkap (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @11:18AM
  • Re:Playstation 2 by Ian Wolf (Score:2) Wednesday January 31 2001, @11:19AM
  • Avifile by crlf (Score:2) Wednesday January 31 2001, @11:20AM
  • Re:What would happen? by -Harlequin- (Score:2) Wednesday January 31 2001, @08:25PM
  • Duh! (Re:A tale from someone who tried...) by -Harlequin- (Score:2) Wednesday January 31 2001, @08:30PM
  • I made one 2 years ago by Mr. Bubbles712 (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @08:33PM
  • Re:Building custom set-top boxes might be importan by cje (Score:2) Wednesday January 31 2001, @08:38PM
  • A remote for you by FreeForm Response (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @08:41PM
  • Re:I recently built one by K8Fan (Score:2) Wednesday January 31 2001, @10:20PM
  • Re:A tale from someone who tried... by Makila (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @10:36PM
  • Re:What's the BBS tax on these? by l-ascorbic (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @11:24PM
  • Completely different by bwoodring (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @11:23AM
  • by CmdrButtPlug (308493) on Wednesday January 31 2001, @11:26AM (#466172) Homepage
    I need a big boy displaying my movies.

    Aaaargh! The image of Arnold Schwarzenegger holding up your DVD shelf is permanently etched into my mind! I think I need professional help!
  • Re:One question by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @11:27AM
  • From the Tivo Hacking FAQ [tivofaq.com]:

    PureDiva: Software only bundled with complete PC's. http://www.purediva.com

    Ligos: Windows based PTV. http://www.ligos.com/news/pr_timeshift.html

    PowerVCR: Windows based VCR. http://www.cyberlink.com.tw/english/products/power vcr2/powervcr2.asp

    WinVCR: Windows based VCR. http://www.cinax.com/Products/winvcr.html

    SnapStream: Windows based PTV (freeware and commercial version). http://www.snapstream.com

    ShowShifter: Windows based PTV (freeware). http://www.showshifter.com

    Also, the Matrox G450 eTV has some PTV software that comes with it for Tivo like functionality. Not sure how it gets its program guide though.

  • Why? by xerx (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @11:29AM
  • My current project by icepick (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @11:55AM
  • It needs to get cheaper by Brainboy (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @11:31AM
  • Oh damn... (Score:3)

    by xFoz (231025) on Wednesday January 31 2001, @11:56AM (#466178)
    ....the TV crashed again. Honey, will you press the reset button for me.
  • by cje (33931) on Wednesday January 31 2001, @11:31AM (#466179) Homepage
    If you look at the way that things have been going lately with regards to content distribution, it's easy to imagine precipitous and draconian scenarios involving unreasonable restrictions for set-top boxes. Take, for example, "standard" set-top boxes such as Tivo and ReplayTV. What would happen if conservative legislators passed a law requiring manufacturers of those devices to screen programs against a "black list" and refuse to show certain material?

    You might wind up with a central server somewhere in the Deep South, operated by Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson or another such people. When people want to use their Tivo to record certain television programs, that server is sent the name of the program, and can send back a rejection message if the program contains things such as nudity, feminism, or Islam. You might think this is a ridiculous example, but look at the way things are going. We've got some crippling potential restrictions on how HDTV signals can be used. We've got the MPAA saying that we don't have the right to use the data our own DVDs in our own home unless we use it the way they want us to. Don't expect things to get any better.

    Our last refuge might lie in our ability to develop our own solutions. We can build the codecs. We can can throw in big honkin' hard drives. We own soldering irons. There is nothing (conceptually) that is stopping us from developing our own devices. And if the government and the corporate community insist on continually levying these ridiculous restrictions on us, it might be the only option we have left. In fact, you might see a large "black market" for unregulated set-top devices spring up. The threat of this possibility should give the corporate control-freaks some pause, because if geeks have demonstrated anything over the past few years, it is that they will not be regulated. And that is a Good Thing (TM).
  • What is the purpose... by bobalu (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @11:57AM
  • Re:Divx dies for a reason... by cronio (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @11:33AM
  • by dschuetz (10924) <slash@ d a v i d . d a s n et.org> on Wednesday January 31 2001, @11:57AM (#466182) Homepage
    I'm building a new house (or, rather, we're paying a big builder boatloads of bucks for a new house), and one of the things I really hope to set up is what I've been calling an UberTiVo. (anyone know how to do a U-Umlaut in an HTML form field?)

    What I've got buzzing around, in the back of my head, is something like this:

    • Kick-ass machine with lots of horsepower (multi-processor, all kinds of RAM, etc.)
    • Big RAID array of IDE drives (like one of those great boxes that turns 8 IDEs into a single SCSI device)
    • Multiple TV tuner cards (including HDTV - has anyone got a good, full-resolution, linux-compatible HDTV tuner card yet? I mean one I can actually buy TODAY, not just something seen at CES).
    • Multiple Video output cards (VGA/S-Video/Composite)
    • Multiple Audio output cards

    (That shouldn't be too expensive, right?)

    Then, this box would be connected to various rooms via Coax (for video) and line-level shielded audio (for audio). Or send the audio through a multi-zone amplifier to wall-mounted speakers. Or something like that. You'd control it via infrared control, repeated from the viewing room back to the box through wireless or wired IR repeaters.

    What would I do with this box? Everything.

    • Multi-input TiVo-like capabilities (record from as many inputs as you've got tuners)
    • MP3 player (with a great TV-based on-screen menu)
    • Video on demand system (just rip DVDs to the RAID array and build a menu around it like for MP3s)
    • Web surfing (gotta get the keyboard/mouse down somehow)
    • Gaming (PS/2, MAME, Doom, etc.)

    Could be way cool. Way, way cool. Of course, a lot of things that I'm thinking about here have significant infrastructure problems -- like, say, how do you distribute HD (TV, not disk) signals through a house?

    In the end, I think the plan I'm settling on involves a big UberTiVo box with multiple inputs, but feeding some massively cool RAID server (that way, I can just use a bunch of really cheap separate computers with one tuner each, if it becomes too difficult to handle more than one input per box). Then use very simple set-top boxes (the little "bookshelf" form factor) with Composite out (or just run VGA straight to an HDTV monitor), sound (to cheap speakers or an in-room stereo), and wireless keyboard and/or game controllers. If I'm really lucky, I can get this sucker to run w/out a fan, too.

    Then, everything just talks back to the main server over 100-meg ethernet. ( that part's easy!)

    Anyone else tackling something like this? From this approach? Or from an approach I should be aware of? I'd love to share ideas....

    david.

  • Re:Playstation 2 (Score:3)

    by The NT Christ (305898) on Wednesday January 31 2001, @11:57AM (#466183) Homepage
    It doesn't get much more proprietory. We're talking about 2 major custom chips with the "Emotion Engine" being a VVLSI chip incorporating basically all the processing power on the machine - the main CPU and it's two partner vector units - and the "GS" being a custom rendering engine. Just the IO/sound processor is an entire PS1 [minus graphics] which communicates with the PS2 stuff using a form of RPC! So it's not only proprietory, it's an extremely complex piece of hardware. It makes PCI look like RS232.

    The Sony docs from phase 1 were complete - including the systems information you'd need for Linux e.g. cache control details, system-level instructions, page-mapping registers, etc. etc. But these docs were only ever printed in dead-tree format, so it's incredibly difficult for them to accidentally escape.

    The Phase 2 docs are PDFs (I have a set at home which might escape if someone asks me nicely) but they miss out this important information.

    Finally, you'd need some form of Trojan to boot the machine, at least until it's chipped - and if you take a PS2 apart, the first thing you notice is that chipping this mofo is not going to be easy! It's some of the densest electronics I've ever seen. The best bet right now seems to be "accidentally" putting a Trojan download program onto a game disk, probably hidden as a buffer-overflow bug which you trigger deliberately, possibly by sending a packet on the serial port input; possibly by inserting an unauthorized CD.

    All this is assuming Sony will not be supportive ... and I think that's a fair bet.

  • Build your own (Score:3)

    by maggard (5579) <michael@michaelmaggard.com> on Wednesday January 31 2001, @11:58AM (#466184) Homepage Journal
    OK - I gotta be cautious here 'cause I don't want to get a buddy in trouble...

    One of the large hardware manufacturers is working on exactly this. Linux-based it's a framework for other companies to license and customize. Their goal is to supply a reference implementation of the base system which of course takes advantage of their hardware.

    Presumably consumer-products companies coming late in the game to "digital-VCR's" will be happy to license this, do some customizing (either in-house or contracted with the developer) and then ship their own branded solutions.

    What's interesting about this for the /. community is just how much of this turns out to be really specialized. From kernel modifications to optimized codecs to specially designed file-systems much of this can't be off-the-shelf for price/performance reasons. Apparently they're not terribly concerned about the home-brew market feeling that it'll just be cheaper to buy a dedicated box then retrofitting other hardware, attempting to get appropriate listings, maintaining the hw/sw, etc.

    Of course I'm sure they're willing to sell their own industry-generic raw hardware to anyone, it's just the package that they're holding out for big fees.

    Frankly even though this topic comes up again & again I think they're probably right. Sure my PC CD-player plays music fine but I prefer to have one in my livingroom dedicated to the audio system. Same with the DVD player, while it plays fine on the box & 21" monitor I've got one in the lvingroom 'cause it's better suited / more convenient there.

    I expect for many of us a TiVo-type consumer box will be far more popular then a homebuilt. It's not like building your own computer 'cause the economics aren't likely to be as sweet and it'll be difficult to get source-material (the listings.)

    Different but related topic:

    What I *do* think would be hot would be custom-program-selection services where one could subscribe and get a selection of program-record-instructions emailed to my TV-box. Rather then it randomly recording stuff it thinks I *might* like or my explicitly setting the recording choices a third option of subscribing to a service (sushi-cooking@asianfood.com or st-nextgen-sans-wesley@stgeek.com) would be interesting.

    Of course for this to work we'd need some sort of TV-listings-XML...

  • mpeg2movie by Erich (Score:2) Wednesday January 31 2001, @12:00PM
  • Re:One word... Indrema by pcosta (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @12:16PM
  • More BS MS bashing.... by SuperSnail 2000 (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @11:39PM
  • Re:Oh damn... by slim (Score:2) Thursday February 01 2001, @01:09AM
  • There's a lot going on.... (more links) by Wackston (Score:1) Thursday February 01 2001, @02:25AM
  • Ever heard of Indrema? by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Thursday February 01 2001, @02:35AM
  • Its already out there - ShowShifter by mtortolano (Score:1) Thursday February 01 2001, @02:40AM
  • Re:we need to take up a collection by Anonymous Slackard (Score:1) Thursday February 01 2001, @04:14AM
  • Re:we need to take up a collection by Ian Wolf (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @11:34AM
  • Zapmedia by BigRing (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @11:35AM
  • Make your own ReplayTV with an All-In-Wonder by djweso (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @11:36AM
  • by Jose (15075) on Wednesday January 31 2001, @11:37AM (#466196) Homepage
    Someone point me to a ReplayTV project.

    there isn't one going per se (at least I haven't seen one yet), but all of the tools are there...on the hardware side, you'll need a tv tuner, and Big-Assed Harddrive (TM).
    On the software side, grab vcr [stack.nl]. VCR is a command line tool to record divx files..it eats processors though, so make sure you got a good one..if you would like something that is a little leaner on the processor, grab mp1e (sorry no web page), the files you write will be bigger, but the quality is good, and only take about 15% of my celery 400.
    To see what is on TV, either grab xmltv [ic.ac.uk], tvguide [cherrynebula.net], or the cream of the crop Mister House [sourceforge.net]

    Mister House looks pretty sweet, since it already embeds links to record shows right in the listings for recording(you'll have to hack it a bit to get it to use vcr/mp1e, but it'll work), and there is already code there for remembering your favourite shows, sorting for movies, etc, etc etc...

    Now if you want to get fancy, you'll grab a DVD anywhere from x10 (to lazy to throw in the link), a second sound card in your Linux box, and a second video card in your Linux box, and it will all get run from your machine sitting in your room so that you don't have a noisy machine sitting your Living Room.
    And of course this also gets you access to your MP3s, and web browser while sitting on the couch...

    So why haven't you built this yet Jose, you ask? I'm working on it OK, GET OFF MY BACK!! =P

  • It is harder than you think! by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @12:22PM
  • Re:So where *is* the hardware? by The NT Christ (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @12:22PM
  • Re:Its not as hard as you might think. by jon_c (Score:2) Wednesday January 31 2001, @11:37AM
  • websurfer, et al... by enrico_suave (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @11:37AM
  • Re:Why limit to the Set-Top? (U-Umlaut offtopic) by invdaic (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @12:24PM
  • Re:Open Source Tivo? by Sabalon (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @11:37AM
  • Re:One word... Indrema by Ondo (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @12:28PM
  • Re:Its not as hard as you might think. by chompz (Score:2) Wednesday January 31 2001, @12:29PM
  • Re:Open Source Tivo? by CmdrButtPlug (Score:2) Wednesday January 31 2001, @12:29PM
  • Re:One word... Indrema by chompz (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @12:34PM
  • I recently built one by Ramshackle (Score:2) Wednesday January 31 2001, @12:47PM
  • It's gottan be big by Carbonate (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @10:51AM
  • What's the BBS tax on these? by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @10:52AM
  • Re:Ever heard of Indrema? by jovlinger (Score:1) Thursday February 01 2001, @04:55AM
  • Set-top linux box by Lumpy (Score:1) Thursday February 01 2001, @05:08AM
  • Re:A tale from someone who tried... by qfajonf (Score:1) Thursday February 01 2001, @05:39AM
  • MPEG2 encoder by rafa (Score:2) Thursday February 01 2001, @05:50AM
  • Re:Playstation 2 by Buck2 (Score:1) Thursday February 01 2001, @06:17AM
  • Re:A tale from someone who tried... by Hanno (Score:2) Thursday February 01 2001, @06:24AM
  • Re:Build your own by maggard (Score:2) Thursday February 01 2001, @07:42AM
  • CmdrTaco's crabs by reubenking (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @11:41AM
  • One word... Indrema by WareW01f (Score:2) Wednesday January 31 2001, @11:43AM
  • Re:It's gottan be big by marcop (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @11:44AM
  • sorta by jon_c (Score:2) Wednesday January 31 2001, @11:45AM
  • What would happen? by niteshad (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @11:48AM
  • Re:It is harder than you think! by jamesbulman (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @12:48PM
  • i've got a beige G3 by option8 (Score:2) Wednesday January 31 2001, @11:49AM
  • Re:Open Source Tivo? by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @11:49AM
  • by Wog (58146) on Wednesday January 31 2001, @12:48PM (#466225)
    That the MediaBox is Linux friendly as well. In fact, here are the requirements:

    Requirements for the Linux Version

    Intel CPU of 600Mhz or greater (current libs have more overhead)
    2.2.16 kernel of higher, JAVA 1.3 w/JMF
    20Gb+ storage space (1Gb per imported DVD) recommended @ UDMA66
    Wireless mouse (not required but suggested)
    Settopbox form factor PC chassis (not required but recommended)
    TV-out card (strongly recommended)
    Internet Connection

  • Re:we need to take up a collection by voidware (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @12:49PM
  • Fished it by stubob (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @11:50AM
  • Re:Its not as hard as you might think. by drsoran (Score:2) Wednesday January 31 2001, @12:51PM
  • BookPC makes good DivX, mp3,..., Mame player by Donem (Score:2) Wednesday January 31 2001, @01:04PM
  • Umlaut HTML by rho (Score:2) Wednesday January 31 2001, @01:12PM
  • Re:It's gottan be big by BSOD Bitch (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @01:18PM
  • Re:Why limit to the Set-Top? by rho (Score:2) Wednesday January 31 2001, @01:19PM
  • Re:Its not as hard as you might think. by UberLame (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @01:20PM
  • Re:Build your own by Cloud 9 (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @01:27PM
  • C'est Français. by AFCArchvile (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @10:55AM
  • Playstation 2 by Buck2 (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @10:58AM
  • About the code by Kon (Score:1) Thursday February 01 2001, @08:19AM
  • by Coccyx The Clown (237937) on Wednesday January 31 2001, @01:29PM (#466238)
    Instead of waiting for sophomoric efforts by enthusiasts, why not just hack the functionality in the X-box? (when it's available) It has the power, and would be very straightforward if it were done correctly. I imagine one would be able to make it work with just about any of the new codecs. And setting up tv-out on a computer can be a pain in the ass, especially wiring it all up if you dont have your tv right next to the computer (not to mention how to control it with your keyboard and mouse 30 feet away). Sure, these problems can be circumvented, but only with added hardware costs. I say the X-box instead of PS2 because of its x86 compatibility, making it easier to port the stuff over. Im sure microsoft doesnt want this to happen (they stress that the xbox is only for gaming, and it would draw the ire from the movie companies), but how are they gonna stop a hack from being possible without restricting the freedom of game developers? The X-box with dynamically upgradeable codecs would be a kick ass combo, especially if it eventually works with DVD-ram technology to allow several movies on one disk. (all of the star wars trilogy on one disk that could play on an installed base of millions of units?) sounds killer.
  • Some Translations by TNLNYC (Score:1) Thursday February 01 2001, @08:28AM
  • Re:What would happen? by jcsmith (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @01:29PM
  • Re:I already did! by bladeohlsson (Score:1) Thursday February 01 2001, @08:44AM
  • Re:Playstation 2 by The NT Christ (Score:1) Thursday February 01 2001, @10:57AM
  • It's about the case, stupid! by xiaoren (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @01:29PM
  • Re:Playstation 2 by The NT Christ (Score:1) Thursday February 01 2001, @10:58AM
  • Re:So where *is* the hardware? by The NT Christ (Score:1) Thursday February 01 2001, @10:59AM
  • Re:More BS MS bashing.... by WNight (Score:2) Thursday February 01 2001, @03:28PM
  • Re:So where *is* the hardware? by unitron (Score:1) Thursday February 01 2001, @03:45PM
  • Re:Divx dies for a reason... by Ramshackle (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @02:20PM
  • One question (Score:5)

    by Flarg! (265195) on Wednesday January 31 2001, @11:00AM (#466249)
    If the average joe builds his own set-top box, will it still have a flashing "12:00"?

    You want corn? I give you corn.

  • Re:we need to take up a collection by SquadBoy (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @11:00AM
  • Re:What about Make your own ReplayTV by yamla (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @11:01AM
  • Re:My prediction by sik puppy (Score:1) Wednesday January 31 2001, @11:02AM
(1) | 2