Eh? I got thinking again about internet broadcasting, most namely, internet radio. This is a topic that I've had my heart on for some time, because I think the fusion of networking and broadcasting is important to the development of both fields. The demand is there, the users want it; but the ever-evil RIAA rears its head and smacks fledgling technologies down in their steps. Why is this? Can't they learn? If Napster hadn't have existed, would RIAA leave internet broadcasting a little more alone?

Once internet broadcasting is a touch more professionalized, the government and media monoliths might lighten up. But no professionals will jump in the market in the condition it's currently in. This is a paradox that I hope will be resolved soon.

Another thing: The Arbitron "ratings" do indie broadcasters no justice, putting all the networks like MusicMatch at the top. The entire purpose of internet broadcasting, in my opinion, is to provide more power to the people ... rather than media giants. Is this going to happen, or will I be sorely disappointed? Case in point: Look at today's issue of RAIN (20 Feb 03) - observe, in the Top 25 Channels (January) list, how many of the channels belong to MusicMatch.

Kudos to Kurt Hanson for keeping us in the know on this topic. I recommend you subscribe to RAIN.

Huzzah, I have a new name on Slashdot. Let's get things cooking again, hm?