Comment Thinking this through (Score 1) 303
Pro) It's a good idea. The long range of AM stations coupled by their non-dependance on a network make them important for emergencies. Like nuclear war, meteor strike scale stuff I mean. We can probably do without for the more localized disasters. And also, assuming they have a generator, solar or something for power but I bet some do.
Con) But only a small fraction of the population would have any idea that they should turn it on and listen. If this is to be considered important there also needs to be a public awareness program.
Pro) Cost? Really? What, 50 US cents to add that?
Con) EV re-design might be required due to interference as mentioned in TFA.
Pro) Don't require that! How about AM is only guaranteed to work when the car is off (accessory mode). Otherwise you get what you get through the interference. But then... these are EVs, no constantly running engine... just make it work when stopped or coasting, not accelerating or something like that.
Neutral) Wait a minute... they are allowing these things to be manufactured with enough RF emission to blank out the AM band? Come on, I want EVs to succeede too but enough of ignoring part 15 rules! How much interference are EVs adding to AM broadcast and all other bands for people who are not currently riding in the car? Regulate that shit!