Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive


Forgot your password?
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. ×
User Journal

Journal Journal: Genetic diversity vs retardation vs Adam/Eve . . . 1

(Hopefully this is going to Samantha Wright's journal, where she can read it, and not mine . . . Never used the "journal" before.)

Oh ye mighty biologist . . . (Saw you signature, and I have no one else to ask, so here goes.)

(btw, I believe in God, but please try and ignore religion and answer from the purely biological perspective . . ., and I mean no offense to anyone from the terminology used below . . . "retardation" may not be politically correct, but I left my "PC" guide book in my other pants. )

If, continual-perpetual "inbreeding" leads to high rates of retardation and birth defects, and (as I last heard from National Geographic) there was one "biological" Eve, and 10-11 or so "biological" Adam's "way far back" . . . then why aren't all 7billion around now . . . retarded with birth defects, after many centuries of inbreeding from a microscopically small starting pool?

Sure, watching CNN or HLN for a few hours, might be convincing evidence . . . that we are all operating under diminished capacity, but still . . .

Why if you're 11 people with common parents living in Rural Kentucky do you end up with blue skin and six fingers or toes, but if its 11 people a couple of ten's of thousands of years ago . . . do we end up with the fantastically diverse spread of "relatively" genetically healthy 7 billion people we have now?


Slashdot Top Deals

Too much of everything is just enough. -- Bob Wier