
Journal Journal: WTF is going on?
Less than two weeks later, in Fort Worth. Texas, a police officer was shot by a store clerk while the officer was arresting a drug dealer. The officer was undercover, but was not wearing a mask, not only identified herself as a police officer, but the jacket she wore clearly identified herself as one, and she was wearing a bulletproof vest. Bad luck was that the bullet missed the vest and entered under her armpit.
What do these two stories have in common? In both cases the cops lied about what happened.
In Arlington the police issued an after-action type report that detailed what happened, but they left out a key event. Just moments before the man jumped, he was shot with a Taser. This fact only came to light with the publication by the Dallas Morning News of a series of photographs by one of their photographers clearly showing a police officer holding a Taser and the jumper being shot by the Taser. The wires connecting the Taser to the jumper are seen quite clearly. The police may not have overtly lied in this case, but they definatley lied by ommission. They only mentioned the Taser after it was public knowledge. (http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/4890564.htm)
In Fort Worth, we have since learned that the officer was wearing a mask, did not identify herself, and while she was wearing a police jacket, it was dark in color and only had a small graphic on the front in the shape of an office's badge. Certainly not large white letters that said POLICE. She was not wearing a bulletproof vest. Contrary to initial reports, she did not purchase drugs in the store and then attempt to arrest the dealer, she or another officer purchased drugs outside the store, then she followed the suspect into the store to arrest him. She did this by driving her car at high speed to the front door, squealled her brakes, then ran in with a pistol in her hand and a mask on her face. I ask you, what was the clerk supposed to think? He thought she was a robber and shot her. (http://www.dfw.com/mld/startelegram/news/local/4873541.htm)
In both cases, the cops either left out important details, or outright lied. The only reason we know they did this is that other people were present with recording devices. In the case of the officer who was shot, the store did have a surveilance system (the tapes of which have not been released). I am certain that if the store did not have cameras, then we never would have heard the truth.
Why is this?
Then today I read about a cop in Detroit who cut off a woman's finger while trying to cuff her. (http://www.freep.com/news/locway/knife7_20030107.htm) And of course there were the cops last week who shot some tourists dog. (http://asia.cnn.com/2003/US/01/08/police.kill.dog/)
What the fuck is going on with our police?