I'm not. My main development these days is outside of my paid employment, and my development is on personal projects related to some non-profits I'm involved in.

When it's on my own time, well development without AI is more fun - I simply opt not to use it.

I'm not alone.

How is that not suspicious to anyone even remotely rational based on name alone?

Agile is incredibly adversarial in the wrong management environment. Can very quickly devolve into the Spanish Inquisition the second a team starts missing "targets" or "commitments" for work that didn't get finished out in a given sprint / tranche / etc.

Couldn't happen sooner. I order Pizza far more often than I fly, and it wouldn't be the first time I've taken a same-day return flight where my luggage needs were minimal.

Ultimately what it leads us to is providing tailored service for the individual, and I'm always for that. I'd happily pay more for extra luggage, but rarely want a meal except on the longest international flights (the 17hr hop from Australia to the Middle East, for instance). And I always provide my own entertainment.

Profit is revenue vs budget. Spend less on graphics, and you don't need to make as much money to turn a profit.

Similarly, spend more of that budget on testing and iterating on game design, story, testing, etc and you're likely to have a better game.

I hate to agree with Github, but the entire point of a fork is that it's a fully separate copy. Commits in the parent repository messing with forks breaks most of the reasons for them in the first place.

How are roadside political signs good for democracy in the first place? Unless Canada's signs have nuanced political position details as opposed to a colour, photo and name, they have literally zero positive impact on any kind of meaningful democratic process.

And yet those "morons" as you put it happily get their work done and play the games they want to nonetheless - regardless of what their legal rights are. Occasionally they'll lose access to something they'd purchased a license for, and they'll get over it and play or use something else.

Software Architect here who very explicitly doesn't support Firefox for our products. Our customers are predominantly corporates, and it tends to only be the occasional infrequent sysad or particularly techy user who even cares about Firefox support. There's just no business case to jutify supporting it in my line of work.

Frankly, Chromium is open source and it just seems stubborn now that Firefox hasn't moved over to it yet. Just like we don't particularly need competition of Linux kernels, I don't feel like we need competition in open source web renderering engines either.

At forty pages, it's something the average secretary would knock over in 20 minutes. With the kind of money the industry throws around, I'm sure it's a non-issue.

Also paranoid hippies. Still fuckwads nonetheless.

As an Australian who occasionally uses Facebook, I'm happy to say good riddance! I wish Google would do the same.

We don't normally have checkpoints between the states in Australia - we created them as part of the pandemic response.

You've just named two of the greatest comedies ever produced, and Friends; are you realistically saying even a tenth of these shows are likely to have the impact of them? For each of those three, there are dozens, nay hundreds of shows that fell by the wayside that didn't match up.

You trust nobody; that's kind of the point.