Author's Note:
Alright all you people out there, I wanna hear some comments!!!
I guess you could call this an open discussion with myself which I'll just keep running along until I hit some deep meaning.
In my understanding of Candide By Voltaire, and Gulliver's Travels By Jonathan Swift, much satire is involved in the writing. This is because both authors were dissatisfied by their lots in life and wished to either bring it to other peoples attentions, affect changes, or through the former, both. Not to say that this didn't cause it's own problems, but the discussion here is about the books themselves.
In Gulliver's Travels Lemuel Gulliver, in the final section, ends up in the land of the horselike people. (I can remember their names, something like Hyooomyhmm.) There he finds that civilization is at its greatest and that he and his fellow people have had it all wrong the entire time. This is an enlightening experience for Gulliver.
In Candide, Candide and his throop end up in the Middle East (can't remember the area) and find themselves confronted with boredom and grief. After all the hardships that they have endured, the reader would think that perhaps life would be good to them. Instead Candide confronts a man who is prosperous and civilized, and he recieves his own enlightenment.
With this enlightenment, he realizes (and his throop), that the world is wrong and that everything should be done with a different attitude.
I notice that each book is almost identical in setup. First mockery, then seriousness. It may seem obvious to other people, and even in retrospect it does seem obvious to me, that this shakes up the reader and makes them pay attention. Of course, this is where the supposed morale is imparted.
Please respond as you wish.