RE: !If they can take something out without getting caught, they could be putting something in." EXACTLY! That is why the appeal in the Lockerbie case was not heard and Abdelbaset Ali al-Megrahi (who denied involvement throughout) was offered compassionate leave to go home for dropping said appeal.

Thank the heavens they've finally worked it all out, at last! Can you believe, all of this time, we actually thought skin already did that?

Hmmm.
1. The Vatican is a recognised Nation (1 of 3 City States) with a seat in the UN (as in un-elected world government).
2. As such, it is a public body and
3. Said Vatican Inc, now claims commercial copyright on its bumph (with the CEO, Pope, anex- Hitler Youth German) and
4. The definition of fascism is: The convergence of government and corporate interests. (There is no other plus the EU blueprint was conceived by the Nazis in the early 1940s), thus -
5. Notwithstanding the separation of church and state issues -
JOB'S DONE?
Exposé

It should be "Serious Design Failure At U$A.gov".
RR

Hmm. Wasn't Obama's father persecuted (some say tortured) by the British and isn't his son now the 'Administrative head' of the all-but-bankrupt corporate UK 'plumb/plump goose' colony (IN ADMINISTRATION) known as the U$A? Aside from the 911 failure connect the dots and communicate, plus using the DisInfo 'blame anybody game' (to attack two nations) technique - apparently 'long-term payback' is now worrying some ... a lot!

If the court won't let the lawyer withdraw from the case he has every right to invoice said court and/or the judge for his: past, present and/or future costs/fees - does he not? There can't be any room for 'judicial immunity' when a decision is blatantly unfair, unjust and inequitable - which is tantamount to judicial negligence misconduct. VOILA! MISTRIAL!

There's more to tea' than meets the eye...

What part of viral and gorilla (sick) marketing do we not get?

Because nobody will be able to receive it?
RR
Kill your TV, and kill it now, before it's too late!

So, let me see if I've got this straight: A:
* fraudulent gov'nor of a
* fraudulent (unconstitutional) 'state' called NM
* fraudulently leasing out Republic of Texas' soil to Virgin (nasty! nasty!) Galactic tours?
FIND: http://republicoftexas.50megs.com/
AND OFFICIAL MAPS: http://www.sonofthesouth.net/texas/republic-texas-map.htm
http://www.earlytexashistory.com/Tx1836/maprepub.html
RR

thinking, "Not another:
a. hom-,
b. racist-,
c. gender-, or
d. age-
o-phobic lawsuit over civil rights violations and/or LIBEL?
RR

Now, if the Irish negotiate in the 'Lisbon Treaty' new referendum fraud:
1. Non-repatriation of funds, and-
2. NO (get this) EXTRADITION, they can:
A. Compete with Israel, and-
B. Devastate other 'European economies'.
RR

Yes. That's it.
A hot air tax on creepy politicians.
Every time they open their big mouths ... make them pay.
Now THAT will certainly lower the global temperature too.
Problems solved.
RR

President Jeb Bush (Get used to it.) becasue they cannot trust anyone else.

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=KF3Ry-xcXAg

RR

The word, or idiom, DEMOCRACY IS NOT IN: The Declaration of Independence, nor The Bill Of Rights, nor (as recalled) The Articles of Confederation. Patrick Henry boycotted the CONstitutional CONvention because he "smelled a rat". And rightly so. Therein lies the enemy. RR PS. Here are the LINKS that prove the USA is still a colony of Great Britain: 1. NOTE: ARTICLE I IS THE DEBT SCHEDULE FOR $18 MILLION FRENCH LIVRES REPAYMENT BY THE USA TO THE BRITISH CROWN (Prince George III). THAT WAS NEVER HONORED BY THE USA. http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/diplomacy/france/fr-1782.htm SEEKING RECOGNITION FOR FREE STATE STATUS via international recognition ... http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/fr-1782.asp 2. FOLLOWED BY " Preliminary Articles of Peace : November 30, 1782" THE SECOND US/UK TREATY-ish (convention for the final treaty to come): "Convention" CONFRMING the USA's Free State Status to attend the final formal Treaty table / RECOGNITION by the UK CROWN. http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/diplomacy/britain/prel1782.htm http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/prel1782.asp 3. FINAL TREATY OF RECOGNITION RATIFIED GAINING INDEPENDENCE BY CONTRACT. The Paris Peace Treaty of September 3, 1783 http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/diplomacy/britain/paris.htmFULLY RECOGNIZING THE USA AS independent ... contingent upon fulfilling the previous Treaty contract(s) - which never happened. QUOTE "The Definitive Treaty of Peace" http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/paris.asp