Yes, you will find streetcleaners who go to the opera, but I doubt you will find one who also eats only fast food in front of the television. When correlation with likely higher impact lifestyle choices such as diet get too high, statistics becomes unable to correct for that.
Yes.
"NVIDIA leads in architecture"
NVIDIA bought Groq, which is never going to run CUDA well, and Anthropic ported to Google's TPU.
Unless the software stack is a complete disaster OpenAI and Anthropic make do, architecture rules. NVIDIA leads in architecture, no competition for NVLINK and C2C in deployment for instance and Groq in its niche only competes with Cerebras.
Small players are more dependent on open source and more easily manipulated by lazy devs, but the biggest spenders don't give a shit about CUDA.
What if the human printed out 100 complete copies of the book for separate sets of annotation while learning it?
Training makes literal non DMCA exempted copies during the process.
Scanning a book and printing out a hundred copies for yourself is not fair use either.
Zuck, Dario and Altman should share a cell.
The cure was to make some lawyers very rich while the copyright owners got peanuts, which also prevented those lawyers from taking it to a higher court. Even so, it ain't over till the supreme court geriatrics divine the penumbra of the law.
At most a mowed lawn and some flower beds for 100 feet is not a lot of fuel.
Of course rich people at the edge want to live right up to the trees, and then their expensive homes can provide the fuel to light up the neighbours.
Still makes it nearly impossible to completely protect the wood structure.
If you make the roof unventilated you could put mineral wool continuous exterior insulation everywhere including across and under the eaves and make it pretty much impossible for fire to get to the inner wood structure even if the gutters are full of burning leaves.
Building open eave buildings in wildfire country is so silly, Americans and Australians love their ventilated roofs to death.
Even with a layer of stucco a wooden inner wall won't get to a temperature to spontaneously combust if you don't do something silly like planting eucalyptus next to it.
You don't need more useless eaters though.
What is the purpose in pretending genotypes/haplogroups/culture/education/age/marital-status/chain-migration don't really matter? Lets be favourable and say it is to make sure the forces in Europe which plunged the world into two world wars don't resurface
Quantity without quality, does not help.
If they stop irregular immigration, they can allow all the medically trained etc immigrants they need and stay under 10 Million comfortably.
Projections underestimating immigration and asylum inflows to rich countries? Say it ain't so.
Why is it not the right answer?
Sure there are nations with far more land to absorb them too, but once asylum seekers are across the borders with torn up/buried passports that is not practically relevant. They are where they want to be and within the human rights framework you can't get rid of them.
As an anti-human-rights nativist getting rid of them regardless is not a problem for me, put them in camps until they are willing to go to some third world nation willing to take them for a bit of cash, but what's your argument for refusing them and the methods to do so?
To the landlord belongs the doorknobs.
