That is no longer a system programming language.

PS. except for homeowners of course.

If it's the same as here, then there is simply no market incentive for localized storage even though there is a massive need. For market to drive distributed storage, you need extremely local pricing.

The one which threatened the other one with nukes if they rename their country.

Just free trade with a dictatorship which has control over literal slavers doing phonescams doing double digit of Billions of damage, sponsors regular cyberattacks and ransomware doing triple digit Billions of damage, which has suppressed wages with a three decade long campaign to buy foreign debt. What's the worst that can happen which is so much worse than it already is?

Rather than letting the Yuan rise, Chinese getting sweet deals on a centrally planned glut of EVs suits Xi more.

Unfortunately a lot of that glut is trash because its produced without sufficient market discipline. They can do better, and will for the major export brands, but what's the point?

Gas wok burners are ridiculously inefficient, a 3kW concave wok burner gets more than hot enough assuming the thermal protection lets it.

If it was simple, they'd do it. Even repairing it when there was a failure was already too expensive, they are just gambling on it being transient now.

Doing maintenance at the frequency needed is clearly almost impossible ... people need to die before it happens.

Not maintenance, repair.

Operators : Take away the legal culpability for dangerously ignoring the need for prohibitively expensive frequent repairs from us, or no more sales. Airbus : Okey dokey.

If this goes wrong and a plane crashes (not unrealistic when a pilot had to leave the cockpit and then couldn't stand any more), the changes to the repair recommendations are going to hang them. Hell, if there are too many long term health problems a class action could destroy them too.

The occurrences exploded after they stopped revisions every time it happened, because the operators found it too expensive/unreliable. So even at that point, it was not a maintenance issue, but a repair issue.

For it to be preventative/maintenance the revisions would have to be performed even more often than that, which would be even more expensive. A plane too expensive to maintain in a state where it doesn't routinely poison the crew and passengers has a design flaw.

They'd better fix it, before they kill a cockpit crew and by extension a plane full of passengers. Given what has already happened, this is not an unlikely failure mode.

It's not even a question of maintenance, it's treating the failure as transient instead of requiring repair.

It's allows neigh deadly air contamination, starting at the cockpit for extra fun, and they don't even repair it when it occurs.

The way Airbus is downplaying this and refusing to reinstate the old maintenance regime tells me this is a near bankruptcy level design flaw, a ground the fleet level fuck up.

Starlink could do some trivial traffic analysis and be 99% certain what's scam traffic.

There are diplomatic and economic costs to becoming more blatantly evil.

They aren't quite ready to stop squeezing industry out of the west, they want to continue neo-mercantilism for a while yet.